Understanding Summation Notation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding summation notation for a function defined as V = ∑λi,j,k hihjhk, where i, j, k range from 1 to 3. The confusion arises regarding the correct interpretation of the summation and the total number of terms involved. It is clarified that there are 27 terms in total, corresponding to all permutations of the indices. A suggested method for organizing the terms is to iterate through the indices systematically, similar to how an odometer functions. This structured approach helps simplify the problem and alleviates the initial frustration.
y35dp
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I know this should be easy and the answer will be glaringly obvious in hindsight but my brain is fried and I can't for the life of me figure this out. My problem is this I have a function as follows;

V = \sum\lambdai,j,k hihjhk (summation over i,j,k where i,j,k = 1,2,3)

I can't work out if this is

V = \lambda1,1,1h13 + \lambda1,1,2h12h2 + ... + \lambda2,3,1h2h3h1 +...

with every permutation of 1, 2 and 3, this should be simple as it is taken as a given in my problem but it is driving me insane.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, what you have so far is correct. And, since there are 3 indices and each can take on 3 values, there will be 3^3= 27 terms in the sum.
It would help to have a "process" for working through them- I recommend changing the last index through 1, 2, 3, then the next, etc.- just like an odometer turns over in a car.

i,j,k= 1,1,1; 1,1,2; 1,1,3; 1,2,1;1,2,2; 1,2,3; 1,3,1; 1,3,2; 1,3,3;
will be the first 9 terms.
The next 9 will be exactly the same but with first number 2 and the last 9 with first number 3.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, you may just have rescued my mental health
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top