Super congfused about finding distance with constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
A car accelerates from rest, covering 100 meters in 6.04 seconds, and the user is trying to determine the distance traveled in the first 2.37 seconds. The initial approach of calculating average velocity and using it to find distance was incorrect due to the constant acceleration involved. Participants suggest using kinematic equations for constant acceleration, specifically x = x0 + v0t + 1/2at^2, to find the acceleration first. The correct method involves calculating acceleration using the formula a = 2x/t^2 and then applying it to find the distance for the shorter time interval. The user is confirmed to be on the right track with this approach.
Butterfly30
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
*confused

A car speeding up from rest to constant accel. travels 100 meters in 6.04s. How far did it travel in the first 2.37 seconds?

So I figure if I divide distance by time 100/6.04 it will give me the velocity 16.5m/s. And since distance = vt I would do d=15.6*2.37 which equals 37.03m but this is wrong. I was also told to try drawing a graph of velocity vs time...but how can I graph numbers such as these (high and low #'s with decimals) If I can't graph it I can't find the slope or y intercept...so I'm lost
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The car is accelerating at a constant rate (if I understand the problem correctly, it's wording is strange), so its velocity is constantly changing.

Do you know any kinematic equations for motion under constant acceleration?
 
In class we've used these: v=v0+at, x=x0+v0t+1/2at^2, and v^2=V0+2a(x-x0)
but from what I see I have an intitial velocity of 0, a distance and starting point which would be x0=0 and x=100m then I have two times... I'm having trouble fitting this all in..
 
Start by using x - x_o = v_{o}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 to find this acceleration, which is a constant value.
 
Can I use the eqtn v=v0+at instead with the initial velocity being zero, velocity being 100m/6.04s and t=6.04s? and solving for a?

and them plug it into the x-x0 eqtn?
 
Last edited:
Butterfly30 said:
Can I use the eqtn v=v0+at instead with the initial velocity being zero, velocity being 100m/6.04s and t=6.04s? and solving for a?

No. The v in that equation is final velocity. You would be using average velocity. Do what CAF123 suggests.
 
Ok so when I solve for a the eqtn is a=2x/t^2. Then I plug a back into the eqtn but I use the second given time... Am I on the right track?
 
Butterfly30 said:
Ok so when I solve for a the eqtn is a=2x/t^2. Then I plug a back into the eqtn but I use the second given time... Am I on the right track?
Yes!
 
Back
Top