Superbright leds and potential dividers

  • Thread starter Thread starter nyxynyx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Leds Potential
AI Thread Summary
To power superbright LEDs, a 12V DC supply should be used with a current-limiting resistor to prevent burnout, typically around 470 ohms for 20 mA current. Using a potentiometer as a voltage divider is ineffective, as it can lead to inconsistent LED performance. When measuring voltage, ensure the multimeter is not affecting the circuit; some LEDs may not light up when the meter is connected. For accurate voltage readings and to determine the optimal current for brightness, a bench power supply with adjustable settings is recommended. Properly managing voltage and current is crucial to avoid damaging the LEDs.
nyxynyx
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to feed a voltage to my superbright leds. I am not sure how many voltages they require to work(6v?)

I have a 12V dc supply from my computer's power supply unit, which i connect to the potentialmeter(500K, 1M). I then tap the voltage and pass it directly to my LED. However, when I connect my multimeter to the LED to check the voltage, some LEDs do not light up, but when I remove the multimeter, the LED lights up. Other LEDs do not face such problem. What is happening here? How then do i measure the voltage?

Also, I realize that the LEDS burn out way before they turn bright. Am i doing something wrong?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Usual practice is to put a resistor in series with the LED.

To get about 20 mA current from your 12V supply, try 470 ohms in series with your LED.

Your voltmeter should work properly then. Using a 500k or 1M potentiometer as a voltage divider is not a good way to do this.
 
If you have access to a bench power supply (i.e. a power supply with adjustable voltage and current limiting), here's a trick you can use:

1) set the current limit to a few (10-ish) mA
2) test the current limit by (briefly!) shorting out the test leads
3) adjust the voltage upwards until the LED turns on--note the voltage at which this occurs
4) assuming your current limit is properly set, adjusting the voltage upwards should result in the current limit kicking in quite shortly (the current-voltage curve should be pretty steep in the forward-active region)
5) turn the current limit to zero, and set the voltage to a volt or so above the LED turn-on voltage
6) very carefully adjust the current limit upwards, and figure out the "sweet spot" for current versus brightness--don't get greedy, and don't exceed more than a few dozen mA (unless we're talking about the really big multi-watt LEDs here)

If you have done this, you'll have (crudely) done what a curve tracer does.

However, as Redbelly98 says, the usual practice is to choose a current-limiting resistor based on the numbers above. It's possible to cheat and not use a resistor, but only when you can guarantee the voltage going to the LED (or that the current is limited properly), which is why it's not frequently done (at least not by amateurs and hobbyists).

If you don't have access to a bench supply, you can do as Redbelly98 suggests, and then use the DMM to figure out what the diode voltage is, and then choose a more appropriate resistor value to increase (decrease) current (the steepness of the voltage-current curve means that you're probably pretty close to the design voltage of the LED).

EDIT: If all the talk of curves doesn't ring a bell:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode#Current.E2.80.93voltage_characteristic
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top