Superconducting levitation and transportation

AI Thread Summary
Superconducting levitation is indeed used in maglev trains, which utilize magnetic coils to repel permanent magnets in the tracks. While superconductors can levitate objects due to their unique properties, the practical application for cars faces challenges, particularly in cooling the superconductors. Although theoretically possible to levitate a car, current methods like junkyard cranes demonstrate that magnetic levitation is feasible. However, using superconductors may not be cost-effective compared to traditional magnets due to heating issues. Overall, while levitating cars is an intriguing concept, practical implementation remains complex.
Mackay1011
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hey, think this post belongs in this section.

I've seen a few videos about superconducting levitation and it is used on trains, correct?

I was wondering if it is possible to levitate an object like a car and propel it forward?


Heres a clip, please don't delete :) watch it please :D

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7459584142767298148&q=Superconducting+Levitation&total=21&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One of the properties of superconductors is that they don't allow a magnetic field to pass through them - this is what allows a small piece of supercoductor to float above a magnet.

Even when superconductors are used in maglev trains they are used for a different reason. In the tracks are permanent magnets, in the train is a magnetic coil repelling these magnets, supercoductor magnets could be used here because it is possible to make a very large electromagnet with no loss of power due to heating. But because of the difficulty of cooling the supercoductor it may be cheaper to use a regular magnet and waste the heat.

It's certainly possible to levitate a car using a magnet - junkyard cranes do it all the time!
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top