How have supernovae shaped the evolution of heavy elements in the Milky Way?

AI Thread Summary
Supernovae in the Milky Way occur at an average rate of 2.2 to 2.7 per century, but this rate may not have been constant over the past 10 billion years. Historically, more massive stars, which are prone to supernovae, were more common, leading to a higher frequency of these events in the early universe. The total number of supernovae since the formation of the Milky Way is difficult to estimate, but it is suggested that they significantly contribute to the heavy elements present today. Current estimates indicate that supernovae produce a substantial amount of heavy elements, but it remains unclear if they account for all heavy elements in the Milky Way. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for comprehending the evolution of the galaxy's elemental composition.
sumi-e
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new here. Can someone help me with several sets of questions?

I know the estimated age of the Milky Way. There is information that there are various types of supernovae in the Milky Way that occur on the average of 2.2 to 2.7 per century.

My first set of question: Is this average of supernovae per century constant going back 10 billion years or so? If the average of supernovae in the Milky Way per century changes as you go back in time, what is the change? And why a change? Is there an estimation of the total number of supernovae that has occurred since the formation of the Milky Way? What is that number? How is the number calculated?

Second set of questions, if I may: On the average (or more detailed if the information is there), what amount of heavy elements are produced by a supernova? What is the total estimated amount of heavy elements in the Milky Way? Are the number of supernovae sufficient to account for all the heavy elements in the Milky Way (excluding for the moment any prior collision with another galaxy and the elements that may have come from it)?

Much thanks,

--Greg
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Question 1. Who knows? Human astronomical records at best go back about 3000 years, and the earliest records are somewhat incomplete. It does stand to reason that when the universe was young, there were probably more stars prone to form supernovae than exist currently.

Question 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_nucleosynthesis
 
Supernova were more common in the past when massive stars were more common. The metallicity of current generation stars, like the sun, is about 2%.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top