Superposition in separation method of variables

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 1K views
Celso
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
In a cube, the specified boundary counditions are V = ##V_{0}## in the ##z = 0## and ##z = d## planes and ##V = 0## for the other sides. Knowing the solution for when only one of the z planes is kept at ##V = V_{0}## how is it possible to use superposition to know ##V(r)## in this situation?
Relevant Equations
##\nabla^2 V = 0##
Each different boundary condition means a different charge configuration, how can this problem be solved using superposition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems very unlikely to me. Anyone says it can be ?
 
Let ##\Phi_0(x,y,z)## = solution when only the face at z = 0 is at ##V_0##.
Let ##\Phi_d(x,y,z)## = solution when only the face at z = d is at ##V_0##.
Assuming that the side of the cube is ##d##, isn't it true that ##\Phi_d(x,y,z)=\Phi_0(x,y,d-z)##?
 
Can you create a square pulse using two step functions? That is the crux of the question. I won't give the answer, as it is homework.
 
BvU said:
Seems very unlikely to me. Anyone says it can be ?
Ah! I get it: the exercise text as it was given to you says so o:) . Then it is most likely true, hmm ?
And @kuruman is giving you (much) more than just a hint !
 
BvU said:
Ah! I get it: the exercise text as it was given to you says so o:) . Then it is most likely true, hmm ?
And @kuruman is giving you (much) more than just a hint !
It's easy to assume that the problem is asking for the solution. Perhaps I was overly generous when I posted but I wanted to point OP in the right direction and there is still quite a bit to be said to complete a formal answer.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and BvU