Superposition, interference and mathematical description

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concepts of superposition and path difference in wave interference. Path difference is defined as the difference in distance traveled by two waves arriving at the same point, which determines their phase relationship. When two waves start in phase and have a path difference of λ/2, they are 180 degrees out of phase, resulting in destructive interference. A phase difference of 90 degrees leads to partial constructive interference, yielding a resultant amplitude that is greater than either wave but less than their sum. Clarifications about path difference and phase relationships are crucial for understanding wave behavior in various contexts, such as light interference in soap films.
Air
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
I understand that this concept is about 2 (or more) waves meeting in constructive (when waves are added to form larger amplitude wave) or destructive (when waves are subtracted to form smaller amplitude waves) inteference but I don't really understand what path difference is about?

I've read up and it shows me many numerical interpretations but I can't understand how I can relate it to superposition.

It would be helpful if someone can explain the concept of path difference. Thank you in advance. :smile:
 
Science news on Phys.org
Say you have two waves that converge at a singe point. To determine the resulting superposition, you need to know their relative phase. If you know their phase at some earlier point (their origin, perhaps) and how far they traveled to get to the destination, you can figure out their phase. If both waves started out with the same phase, you can determine their phase difference by comparing the difference in the paths that each took. (Think of the path length as measured in wavelengths.) The "path difference" will tell you their relative phase. If they started out in phase, but one traveled an extra quarter wavelength (say) the path difference would be \lambda/4, which corresponds to a phase difference of 90 degrees.

So if two waves started out in phase and had a path difference of \lambda/2 when they arrived at the destination, they would be 180 degrees out of phase and would demonstrate destructive interference.

Make sense?
 
Last edited:
Yes, It does. Thank you.

But, I have one more question...
If two waves are out out phase by 90^{\circ}, would this cause constructive interference? I thought constructive interference is caused when the waves meet in phase so would this have the same affect but their amplitude would not be as large?
 
Completely constructive interference would occur when the phase difference is an integral multiple of 2 \pi (360 degrees); Completely destructive interference would occur when the phase difference is \pi (180 degrees). Any other phase difference--such as 90 degrees--would give you something in between.

But you are correct that two waves out of phase by 90 degrees would have a resultant amplitude greater than either one but less than their sum.
 
Sorry, for bringing back this thread back but my question is related to path difference.

Q: The path difference is 2.22 \times 10^{-7}m in the soap film. The wavelength of the yellow sodium light in the soap film is 4.44 \times 10^{-7}. Explain why the part of the film appears dark to the student.
A: The answer said that the path difference is \frac{\lambda}{2} so waves will meet in antiphase.

Isn't \frac{\lambda}{2} equal to 90^{\circ} out of phase so it wouldn't meet in antiphase? I agree there may be some destructive interference but I thought waves wouldn't meet in antiphase as it is 180^{\circ} out of phase.
 
Air said:
Isn't \frac{\lambda}{2} equal to 90^{\circ} out of phase so it wouldn't meet in antiphase?
No, a complete wavelength equals 360 degrees of phase difference (and thus in phase), so \lambda/2 = 180 degrees (and thus perfectly out of phase).
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top