Superposition of 3 point masses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the net gravitational force on sphere B due to spheres A and C, using the formula F = GMm/r^2. The initial calculation yielded an incorrect result of 3.0E-9, prompting the user to seek clarification on their arithmetic. After reviewing the steps, it was determined that the correct value is approximately 3.40125 × 10^-9, as confirmed by using an online calculator. The discrepancy arose from limitations in the user's calculator display. The final conclusion affirms that the method used was correct, and the accurate result was identified.
bravoman
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure below, three 2.00 kg spheres are located at distances d1 = 0.300 m and d2 = 0.400 m. What are the magnitude and direction of the net gravitational force on sphere B due to spheres A and C?

13-33.gif


Homework Equations


F = GMm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


F=sqrt((4G/0.4^2)^2 + (4G/0.3^2)^2)
F = 3.0E-9

But that answer is wrong. Is there a mistake in my arithmetic? Of am i missing another term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bravoman said:
Is there a mistake in my arithmetic?
Yes. please post all steps.
 
F (B->C) = G(2)(2)/(0.4^2) = 4G/0.16
F (B->A) = G(2)(2)/(0.3^2) = 4G/0.09

F (B->net) = F(B->C) + F(B->A)
Can't add these together since they aren't the same direction, so use Pythagoras' theorem:

F^2 (B->net) = F^2(B->C) + F^2(B->A) = sqrt((4G/0.16)^2 + (4G/0.09)^2)
 
bravoman said:
F (B->C) = G(2)(2)/(0.4^2) = 4G/0.16
F (B->A) = G(2)(2)/(0.3^2) = 4G/0.09

F (B->net) = F(B->C) + F(B->A)
Can't add these together since they aren't the same direction, so use Pythagoras' theorem:

F^2 (B->net) = F^2(B->C) + F^2(B->A) = sqrt((4G/0.16)^2 + (4G/0.09)^2)
Yes, I understand you're doing that, but your result is inaccurate (not wildly wrong). I can't tell where the inaccuracy comes in unless you post all steps.
 
Just had a thought... is this what you meant to post, or have you left out a digit?
bravoman said:
3.0E-9
 
haruspex said:
Yes, I understand you're doing that, but your result is inaccurate (not wildly wrong). I can't tell where the inaccuracy comes in unless you post all steps.
Im sorry, I don;t understand what you mean by "Post all steps", these are all the steps I have done. What more is there?
 
haruspex said:
Just had a thought... is this what you meant to post, or have you left out a digit?
3.0E-9 is the result my calculator gives me, although the numbers may be cut-off since the calculator display is limited to 10 digits. I'll use an online calculator and see if it makes a difference
 
bravoman said:
3.0E-9 is the result my calculator gives me, although the numbers may be cut-off since the calculator display is limited to 10 digits. I'll use an online calculator and see if it makes a difference
wolfram alpha gives 3.40125... × 10^-9 , so that might be the problem. Can you verify that the way I did the question is indeed correct?
 
bravoman said:
wolfram alpha gives 3.40125... × 10^-9 , so that might be the problem
Here are my steps (spreadsheet)
d1= 0.3
d2= 0.4
1/d1^4= 123.46
1/d2^4= 39.06
sum= 162.52
sqrt(sum)= 12.75
G= 6.67E-011
m*m= 4
*G*m*m= 3.40E-009
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
Here are my steps (spreadsheet)
d1= 0.3
d2= 0.4
1/d1^4= 123.46
1/d2^4= 39.06
sum= 162.52
sqrt(sum)= 12.75
G= 6.67E-011
m*m= 4
*G*m*m= 3.40E-009

3.40125 × 10^-9 is indeed the correct answer! It was my calculator that ran out of displaying digits to properly show the number. Thank you for your time.
 
Back
Top