Superposition of Forces: Finding Magnitude and Direction

ecsx00
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/fvNbE
Part a needs to have up to 2 significant figures.
For part b. you need to find theta or the degrees counter clockwise from +x direction.

Homework Equations


Coulombs Law:
F = 9(10^9) |q1q2|/r^2
r = distance in meters of two charges

The Attempt at a Solution


Part A.
F(Q on q1) = 9(10^9) N*m^2/C^2 * (2*10^-6 C)(4*10^-6 C) / (0.5m)^2
= 0.288 N

F(q2 on q1) = 9(10^9) N*m^2/C^2 * (2*10^-6)^2 / (0.60m)^2
= 0.1 N

|F| = sqroot( (0.288 N)^2 + (0.1 N)^2 ) = 0.304867 N *I know this is wrong because I tried to submit this answer and it was no go.*Part B.
atan(0.1 N/0.288 N) = 19.148 degress
180 - 19.148 = 160.852 degress
*For this part I figured I take 180 and subtract the degrees obtained to get the degrees counter clockwise of the +x direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ecsx00 said:

Homework Statement


[PLAIN]http://imgur.com/fvNbE[/QUOTE]

The image is not embedded properly. Please correct that.

|F| = sqroot( (0.288 N)^2 + (0.1 N)^2 ) = 0.304867 N *I know this is wrong because I tried to submit this answer and it was no go.*

This is wrong, because the forces from two charges are not perpendicular to each other. You need to find x and y components of each force, from those, get the x and y components of the resultant force, and then compute its magnitude and direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top