Superposition of Two Travelling Waves, Different Amplitudes

bananabandana
Messages
112
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I'm looking at an E&M textbook - "Time-Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields". They state:
"A more general ##x ## polarized field is one consisting of waves traveling in opposite directions with unequal amplitudes - i.e :
(1) $$ E_{x} = Ae^{-jkz} +Ce^{jkz}$$
Let ## A ## and ##C## be real. We express the field in terms of an amplitude and phase. This gives:
(2) $$E_{x} = \sqrt{A^{2}+C^{2}+2ACcos(2kz)} \ e^{-jtan^{-1} \bigg( \frac{A-C}{A+C} tan(kz) \bigg) } $$"​

But I can't see where this comes from.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


It would have though that amplitude is coming out of a cosine rule - that there is a vector triangle with ##\vec{A}## and ##\vec{C}## as two sides. In the argand/phasor diagram, the angle between ##Ae^{-jz} ## and ##Ce^{jz}## is going to be fixed (for any given time) as ##2kz## (or ## 2\pi -2kz ##) So by applying the cosine rule, I'd expect:
$$ |E_{x}| = |A|^{2}+|C|^{2} -2|A||C|cos(2kz) $$
But in the book there is a plus. Is this a typo, or have I messed up?

and I can get the phase from just expanding out ##E_{x} ## into components - from (1):
$$E_{x}= (A+C) cos(kz) + j(C-A)sin(kz)$$
So if we want to write ## E_{x} ## as: $$E_{x} = |E_{x}| e^{j\phi} = |E_{x}| (cos\phi + jsin\phi)$$ Then:
$$ tan(\phi) = \frac{C-A}{A+C} tan(kz) \implies tan(-\phi) = \frac{A-C}{A+C} tan(kz), \therefore \phi =-tan^{-1}\bigg(\frac{A-C}{A+C} tan(kz) \bigg) $$

If that second bit is right - is the reason that we can't equate amplitude of that equation with the book amplitude because we have ignored time dependence? Just started doing this, so any help is appreciated.

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bananabandana said:
But in the book there is a plus. Is this a typo, or have I messed up?
Try to calculate the modulus of
$$E_{x}= (A+C) cos(kz) + j(C-A)sin(kz)$$.
 
  • Like
Likes bananabandana
Ah, that's embarrassing. Out of interest - why is the cosine rule idea not valid? Please see picture.
**EDIT**: Oops, in the diagram ##\vec{A}## and ##\vec{C}## have the opposite phase to as written in the question.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-08-05 at 20.28.19.png
    Screen Shot 2015-08-05 at 20.28.19.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 540
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top