Superwind phase in stellar evolution

AI Thread Summary
Rapid mass loss during the superwind phase occurs because the stellar envelope becomes energetically unfavorable, leading to its ejection. This process is influenced by the pulsation of stars, particularly in the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) phase, where the compression and expansion of the envelope facilitate the formation of molecules and dust. These molecules enhance radiation pressure, which overcomes gravitational forces, resulting in significant mass loss. Additionally, the dredge-up of carbon and oxygen contributes to the formation of grains that are easily expelled by stellar radiation. Overall, the interplay of pulsation, radiation pressure, and molecular formation drives the rapid mass loss observed in this phase of stellar evolution.
vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
why is there very rapid mass loss in the superwind phase. my notes simply say "because the envelope attains positive binding energy".

Firstly, how can binding energy be positive by definition?!

Secondly, I am not entirely sure what the lecturer is talking about? what makes the envelope "attain positive binding energy" in the first place? Can't find anything relavent in Carroll and Ostlie:(

thanks in advance:)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
bump this one too:)
 
I'm not sure this mechanism is fully known, however during the AGB phase we observe that some stars begin to pulsate (Mira variables). The systematic compression and expansion causes material to "bunch up" making the formation of molecules (and dust etc.) easier. These trap the outgoing flux and essentially drive a strong wind.
 
vertices said:
why is there very rapid mass loss in the superwind phase. my notes simply say "because the envelope attains positive binding energy".
thanks in advance:)

I think it just means that the bound system becomes energetically unfavourable in favour of the unbound? That is to say, the envelope would prefer to be ejected..
 
so the mass loss is simply a consequence of the star pulsating.

thanks again astrorob.
 
Mass loss is due to radiation pressure (outward) overcoming gravitation (inward).

In very massive stars, the gravity at the surface is weak and the radiation strong, so the matter gets blown away.

As astrorob says, in AGB stars molecules form as the star pulsates. This is due to the dredge-up of carbon and/or oxygen from inside the star. The molecules form into grains which are easily blown outwards by the stellar radiation.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top