Suppose a nut becomes loose and gets detached from a satellite

  • Thread starter Thread starter zorro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
A loose nut detached from a satellite will continue in its orbit due to inertia, but it can eventually fall back to Earth due to atmospheric drag. An astronaut cannot directly make the nut land on Earth; however, small disturbances can alter its orbit. To effectively deorbit the nut, it would need to be thrown opposite to its orbital direction, although this would be impractical for achieving significant changes. Without completely canceling its orbital velocity, the nut will still enter a lower orbit before re-entering the atmosphere. Ultimately, the best strategy for maximizing energy loss and minimizing distance to Earth is to throw the nut behind the astronaut, against the direction of motion.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
Suppose a nut becomes loose and gets detached from a satellite revolving around the earth.
The nut will continue in its orbit due to its inertia. My question is how can an astronaut make it land on earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


An astronaut can't make the nut land on earth. Because such a small object will have a much greater drag compared to its mass, the nut will likely fall back from low Earth orbit in weeks, but will then burn up in the upper atmosphere.
 


Drag depends on altitude, i.e. air density. To make a nut fall to earth, change its velocity vector to point toward earth.
 


How can we change its velocity vector towards earth? If the astronaut throws the nail towards earth, will it land on earth? Or after leaving the satellite, it again follows the orbit due to inertia?
 


Throw it either down or behind him.

Small disturbances will change the orbit radius, until ultimately it will crash into the earth.
 


The best way to deorbit the nut is to throw it opposite the orbital direction - though in practice one couldn't throw it enough, one would instead perform a de-orbital burn.

IF one totally canceled out the orbital velocity of the nut, it'd fall straight down. Without a total cancellation, it'll still enter a lower orbit.

If you restrict yourself to actually "throwing" the nut, you probably won't make a huge difference in its orbit no matter what you do, but you'll maximize the energy loss and minimize the distance of closest approach to the Earth by throwing it behind you, against the direction of orbital motion.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top