Suppose there is an extra compact dimension, and suppose

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Dimension
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Suppose there is an extra compact spatial dimension in addition to familiar space dimensions x, y, and z. Let us suppose that matter is some kind of 3 dimensional surface moving in these 4 spatial dimensions, 4-space, in some cyclical manner. Let us suppose that from the shape of the surface we can get physics. Assume as an observer we ourselves are some complicated 3 dimensional surface in 4-space. Now as observers we only notice the dimensions x, y, and z. At a given instant matter is "distributed" about in 4-space so that in 3-space at a given instant matter is but a 2 dimensional surface in 3-space. Matter is nowhere and in time everywhere.

Thanks for any thoughts or help making this more interesting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kaluza-Klein theory:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza–Klein_theoryIt was originally formulated as a way to geometrically unify electromagnetism with gravity. Solving the Einstein field equations in 4+1 dimensions (where one of the spatial dimensions is periodic) gives the 10 original EFEs for 3+1 dimensions along with Maxwell’s equations. There’s also an extra scalar equation that predicts the existence of a hypothetical particle called the dilaton which has never been observed. KK theory has fallen somewhat out of favor because it only treats fermions in an ad hoc manner, but it is an important jumping off point for many modern beyond-Standard-Model theories that incorporate dimensional compactification.
 
  • Like
Likes Spinnor
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top