Surface gravity as a function of luminosity?

AI Thread Summary
Surface gravity, defined as g = GM/R², is questioned in relation to luminosity along the main sequence. The relationship derived indicates that as luminosity increases, surface gravity appears to weaken, but this may oversimplify the problem. The discussion highlights that while mass (M) is constant, temperature (T) can vary significantly, potentially impacting surface gravity more than initially assumed. The assumption that all other variables remain constant is challenged, suggesting a more complex interaction between luminosity, temperature, and surface gravity. Overall, the relationship between these factors requires deeper exploration beyond the initial calculations.
Mr. Bond
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I've been using these forums for awhile but this is my first post. So thanks in advance for taking the time to consider this problem. It is much appreciated.

The question is: How does surface gravity vary as a function of luminosity along the main sequence?

By surface gravity, I'm sure the question is asking for g=\frac{G M}{R^2}. Knowing that luminosity is L=4 \pi R^2\sigma _{\text{SB}} T^4. I've solved for R in the luminosity equation and obtained g=\frac{4 \pi G M T^4 \sigma _{\text{SB}}}{L}, but I'm pretty sure the problem is supposed to be harder than this. It's obvious (according to this relationship that's probably wrong) that if luminosity increases, then the surface gravity becomes weaker. So am I looking at this problem too simplistically?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are assuming all the other terms in the expression for g as a function of L remain constant. I am not a student of this subject, but that appears to be a very strong assumption.
 
All of them are constants except for L and possibly T. I'm pretty sure M is a constant because surface gravity is the gravity of the total mass.
 
There is no such thing as surface gravity. Gravity is always calculated based on the center of mass.
 
Mr. Bond said:
All of them are constants except for L and possibly T. I'm pretty sure M is a constant because surface gravity is the gravity of the total mass.

I suspect that the dependence on T is quite strong, weakening your original assertion.
 
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
75
Views
9K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
286
Back
Top