Surface integral (Flux) with cylinder and plane intersections

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
38 replies · 8K views
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$
EDIT: if this is the case, then shouldn't ##|r_u\times r_v| dA = r\,dr\,d\theta, ##instead of just ##dA##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
CAF123 said:
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$

Yes, that's it.
 
Did you catch my edit in the last post?
 
CAF123 said:
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$
EDIT: if this is the case, then shouldn't ##|r_u\times r_v| dA = r\,dr\,d\theta, ##instead of just ##dA##?

Assuming we are still on polar coordinates ## \vec{r}=(r cos \theta, r sin \theta, 0)## , ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta|=r##, ##dA= dr d\theta##. So ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta| dr d\theta## IS ##r dr d\theta##.
 
Dick said:
Assuming we are still on polar coordinates ## \vec{r}=(r cos \theta, r sin \theta, 0)## , ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta|=r##, ##dA= dr d\theta##. So ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta| dr d\theta## IS ##r dr d\theta##.
I see that this implies that dS = r dr dθ. But in the example from the website they also have dA = r dr dθ. How does this follow if dA = dr dθ? How can it equal two different things?
 
CAF123 said:
I see that this implies that dS = r dr dθ. But in the example from the website they also have dA = r dr dθ. How does this follow if dA = dr dθ? How can it equal two different things?

They are two different uses of the symbol 'dA'. They are two different things.
 
Dick said:
They are two different uses of the symbol 'dA'. They are two different things.
Ok, thanks. I think this also answers one of my other questions: The form dA=dr dθ is not really an area element because the dimensions don't check out. What is the difference between the two forms?
 
CAF123 said:
Ok, thanks. I think this also answers one of my other questions: The form dA=dr dθ is not really an area element because the dimensions don't check out. What is the difference between the two forms?

We've been over that several times already. dr dθ is the area element without the jacobian part 'r'. You use that in the cross product form of the surface integral because the cross product contains the jacobian part, 'r'. If you are just integrating a function in polar coordinates you want the full area element, i.e. with jacobian r dr dθ.
 
Dick said:
We've been over that several times already. dr dθ is the area element without the jacobian part 'r'. You use that in the cross product form of the surface integral because the cross product contains the jacobian part, 'r'. If you are just integrating a function in polar coordinates you want the full area element, i.e. with jacobian r dr dθ.
Ok, everything makes sense. Thanks so much!