Surface integral (Flux) with cylinder and plane intersections

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating a surface integral involving a vector field over a closed surface composed of a portion of a cylinder and intersecting planes in the first octant. The vector field is given as \(\vec{F} = zx\vec{i} + xy\vec{j} + yz\vec{k}\), and the surface \(S\) includes parts of the cylinder defined by \(x^2 + y^2 = R^2\) and the planes \(x=0\), \(y=0\), \(z=0\), and \(z=H\).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of the surface integral and the identification of the surfaces involved. There are attempts to express the integrals for each surface, with some questioning the correctness of their normal vectors and parametrizations. The original poster seeks guidance on setting up the integrals for the remaining surfaces and expresses uncertainty about the evaluation of certain integrals.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the setup of the integrals, suggesting corrections to the parametrization and normal vectors. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these corrections on the evaluation of the integrals. Multiple interpretations and approaches are being discussed, but no consensus has been reached regarding the final evaluations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of using unit normal vectors and the correct parametrization for the surfaces. There is also mention of constraints related to the first octant and the specific limits of integration for the surfaces involved.

  • #31
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$
EDIT: if this is the case, then shouldn't ##|r_u\times r_v| dA = r\,dr\,d\theta, ##instead of just ##dA##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
CAF123 said:
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$

Yes, that's it.
 
  • #33
Did you catch my edit in the last post?
 
  • #34
CAF123 said:
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$
EDIT: if this is the case, then shouldn't ##|r_u\times r_v| dA = r\,dr\,d\theta, ##instead of just ##dA##?

Assuming we are still on polar coordinates ## \vec{r}=(r cos \theta, r sin \theta, 0)## , ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta|=r##, ##dA= dr d\theta##. So ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta| dr d\theta## IS ##r dr d\theta##.
 
  • #35
Dick said:
Assuming we are still on polar coordinates ## \vec{r}=(r cos \theta, r sin \theta, 0)## , ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta|=r##, ##dA= dr d\theta##. So ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta| dr d\theta## IS ##r dr d\theta##.
I see that this implies that dS = r dr dθ. But in the example from the website they also have dA = r dr dθ. How does this follow if dA = dr dθ? How can it equal two different things?
 
  • #36
CAF123 said:
I see that this implies that dS = r dr dθ. But in the example from the website they also have dA = r dr dθ. How does this follow if dA = dr dθ? How can it equal two different things?

They are two different uses of the symbol 'dA'. They are two different things.
 
  • #37
Dick said:
They are two different uses of the symbol 'dA'. They are two different things.
Ok, thanks. I think this also answers one of my other questions: The form dA=dr dθ is not really an area element because the dimensions don't check out. What is the difference between the two forms?
 
  • #38
CAF123 said:
Ok, thanks. I think this also answers one of my other questions: The form dA=dr dθ is not really an area element because the dimensions don't check out. What is the difference between the two forms?

We've been over that several times already. dr dθ is the area element without the jacobian part 'r'. You use that in the cross product form of the surface integral because the cross product contains the jacobian part, 'r'. If you are just integrating a function in polar coordinates you want the full area element, i.e. with jacobian r dr dθ.
 
  • #39
Dick said:
We've been over that several times already. dr dθ is the area element without the jacobian part 'r'. You use that in the cross product form of the surface integral because the cross product contains the jacobian part, 'r'. If you are just integrating a function in polar coordinates you want the full area element, i.e. with jacobian r dr dθ.
Ok, everything makes sense. Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K