Surface integral (Flux) with cylinder and plane intersections

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the surface integral of the vector field \(\vec{F} = zx\vec{i} + xy\vec{j} + yz\vec{k}\) over a closed surface \(S\) composed of a cylinder and intersecting planes in the first octant. Participants clarify the setup of integrals for various surfaces, including the cylinder and planes \(z=0\), \(x=0\), \(y=0\), and \(z=H\). The correct parametrization for the cylinder is established as \(\vec{r}(\theta, z) = R\cos\theta \vec{i} + R\sin\theta \vec{j} + z\vec{k}\), leading to the evaluation of integrals resulting in terms of \(HR^3\) and \(\pi H^2 R^2\). The importance of using unit normal vectors and correct limits in integrals is emphasized throughout the discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates and parametrization
  • Knowledge of vector fields and normal vectors
  • Ability to evaluate double integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method for evaluating surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Learn about parametrization techniques for different surfaces
  • Explore the concept of unit normal vectors and their significance in integrals
  • Practice solving problems involving surface integrals with varying geometries
USEFUL FOR

Students in advanced calculus, particularly those studying vector calculus, engineers working with fluid dynamics, and mathematicians focusing on surface integrals and vector fields.

  • #31
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$
EDIT: if this is the case, then shouldn't ##|r_u\times r_v| dA = r\,dr\,d\theta, ##instead of just ##dA##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
CAF123 said:
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$

Yes, that's it.
 
  • #33
Did you catch my edit in the last post?
 
  • #34
CAF123 said:
I see. So they are essentially using the form $$ dS = \frac{(r_u \times r_v)}{|r_u \times r_v|}|r_u \times r_v| dA = \hat{n} r\,dr\,d\theta$$
EDIT: if this is the case, then shouldn't ##|r_u\times r_v| dA = r\,dr\,d\theta, ##instead of just ##dA##?

Assuming we are still on polar coordinates ## \vec{r}=(r cos \theta, r sin \theta, 0)## , ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta|=r##, ##dA= dr d\theta##. So ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta| dr d\theta## IS ##r dr d\theta##.
 
  • #35
Dick said:
Assuming we are still on polar coordinates ## \vec{r}=(r cos \theta, r sin \theta, 0)## , ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta|=r##, ##dA= dr d\theta##. So ##|\vec{r}_r\times \vec{r}_\theta| dr d\theta## IS ##r dr d\theta##.
I see that this implies that dS = r dr dθ. But in the example from the website they also have dA = r dr dθ. How does this follow if dA = dr dθ? How can it equal two different things?
 
  • #36
CAF123 said:
I see that this implies that dS = r dr dθ. But in the example from the website they also have dA = r dr dθ. How does this follow if dA = dr dθ? How can it equal two different things?

They are two different uses of the symbol 'dA'. They are two different things.
 
  • #37
Dick said:
They are two different uses of the symbol 'dA'. They are two different things.
Ok, thanks. I think this also answers one of my other questions: The form dA=dr dθ is not really an area element because the dimensions don't check out. What is the difference between the two forms?
 
  • #38
CAF123 said:
Ok, thanks. I think this also answers one of my other questions: The form dA=dr dθ is not really an area element because the dimensions don't check out. What is the difference between the two forms?

We've been over that several times already. dr dθ is the area element without the jacobian part 'r'. You use that in the cross product form of the surface integral because the cross product contains the jacobian part, 'r'. If you are just integrating a function in polar coordinates you want the full area element, i.e. with jacobian r dr dθ.
 
  • #39
Dick said:
We've been over that several times already. dr dθ is the area element without the jacobian part 'r'. You use that in the cross product form of the surface integral because the cross product contains the jacobian part, 'r'. If you are just integrating a function in polar coordinates you want the full area element, i.e. with jacobian r dr dθ.
Ok, everything makes sense. Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K