Surface integral problem formula question

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



My book says proves this formula

\iint_S f(x,y,z) dS = \iint_D f(x,y,g(x,y)) \sqrt{\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \right )^2 + \left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \right )^2 + 1 } \;dA

Any surface with equation z = g(x,y) can be regarded as a parametric surface with parametric equations

x = x

y = y

z = g(x,y)

rx = i + gx k


ry = j + gy k


|rx x ry| = \sqrt{\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \right )^2 + \left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \right )^2 + 1 }

Thus


\iint_S f(x,y,z) dS = \iint_D f(x,y,g(x,y)) \sqrt{\left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} \right )^2 + \left (\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} \right )^2 + 1 } \;dA


Question

How do they know that every parametrization falls nicely as x = x and y = y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the surface is w = f(x, y, z), but if we're given that z is a function of x and y (i.e., z = g(x, y)), then we have w = f(x, y, g(x, y)). And instead of integrating over some surface S in three-dimensional space, we can integrate over a two-dimensional region in the x-y plane, D. I think that's all they're saying.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top