dspch11
- 2
- 0
I am agonizing about the following integral identity:
<br /> \frac{d}{dt} \int \int_{g(x,y) \leq t} f(x,y) dx dy = \int_{g(x,y)=t} f(x,y) \frac{1}{\left| \nabla g(x,y) \right|} ds,<br />
where ds is the line element. Clearly, using the Heavisite step function, the condition g(x,y) \leq t is transferred into the integrand. Differentiation with respect to t yields a Dirac delta-function. However, how can I eventually arrive at the line integral. The picture is quite clear, if one imagines a domain defined by g(x,y) \leq t which is growing with t. The increase in the integral can then be evaluated by summing contributions along its circumference with \left| \nabla g(x,y) \right| giving the density of isolines.
How can one formally obtain this result?
Thank you for you help,
Daniel
<br /> \frac{d}{dt} \int \int_{g(x,y) \leq t} f(x,y) dx dy = \int_{g(x,y)=t} f(x,y) \frac{1}{\left| \nabla g(x,y) \right|} ds,<br />
where ds is the line element. Clearly, using the Heavisite step function, the condition g(x,y) \leq t is transferred into the integrand. Differentiation with respect to t yields a Dirac delta-function. However, how can I eventually arrive at the line integral. The picture is quite clear, if one imagines a domain defined by g(x,y) \leq t which is growing with t. The increase in the integral can then be evaluated by summing contributions along its circumference with \left| \nabla g(x,y) \right| giving the density of isolines.
How can one formally obtain this result?
Thank you for you help,
Daniel
Last edited by a moderator: