Surface tension of a torus raindrop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of surface tension forces in raindrops, comparing spherical and toroidal shapes. For a spherical raindrop, the force due to surface tension is calculated using a single boundary, resulting in the formula 2pi*R*gamma. In contrast, a toroidal raindrop has two distinct boundaries (inner and outer), leading to a combined force expression of 2pi*R*gamma + 2pi(R+2r)*gamma. The key point is that the torus's two boundaries account for the additional component in the surface tension force calculation. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurately modeling the physics of raindrop shapes.
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When calculating the difference in pressure inside a spherical raindrop, the force exerted by the surface tension is calculated to be 2pi*R*gama, where R is the radius of the drop and gamma is dE/dS (dyne/cm).
When the shape of the raindrop is said to be that of a torus, the force exerted by the surface tension is calculated to be 2pi*R*gamma + 2pi(R+2r)*gamma (please see attachment).
My question is simply why does the force in the case of the torus have two components, whereas in the case of a sphere it has only one?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Torus.JPG
    Torus.JPG
    8.9 KB · Views: 465
Physics news on Phys.org
In both cases, the expression is the length of the boundary (as seen in a 2D-projection) multiplied by gamma. A circle has one boundary, the torus has 2 (inner+outer).
 
But isn't the circle's circumference considered a boundary? Or shouldn't it be? Is it not a thin layer of fluid verging on air?
 
But isn't the circle's circumference considered a boundary?
Of course. That should be the origin of 2pi*R*gamma.
You get a layer of fluid/air in contact there.
 
Okay. Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top