Swinging an object in a vertical plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Vertical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum speed required for an object to maintain circular motion while swinging in a vertical plane, which is determined to be 1.6 m/s. At the top of the swing, the tension in the rope is zero, and the centripetal force is provided solely by gravity. The maximum speed at the bottom of the swing was calculated using conservation of energy, resulting in a speed of approximately 3.51 m/s. The tension in the rope at the bottom of the circular path is then calculated to be 4.0 N. Overall, the calculations demonstrate the relationship between speed, tension, and gravitational forces in circular motion.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



An object with a mass of 0.100kg is attached to a 0.25m long rope and swung in a circle in the vertical plane.

What is the slowest speed possible speed that the object can swing and maintain circular motion? What is the tension in the string at the bottom of the circular path?

Homework Equations



##m = 0.100kg##
##r = 0.25m##
##g = 9.8m/s^2##

##F_{net} = F_C = \frac{mv^2}{r}##

The Attempt at a Solution



The tension in a circular loop changes; it goes from a maximum at the bottom to a minimum at the top. At the top, where the force of gravity is helping the object turn, there is a moment when only the force of gravity is turning the object. In this instant, the tension force equals zero, the centripetal force equals the force of gravity and the minimum speed can be derived.

##F_T = F_C - F_G##
##\Rightarrow v = \sqrt{gr} = 1.56m/s##

Only 2 significant figures allowed, so the min speed would be 1.6m/s.

Now the second part of the question confused me at first. There's no way the min speed = the max speed, and the max speed is needed to calculate the tension. I know that the maximum speed would be at the bottom of the circular path, but I have no way of finding the velocity from the information given. So that leads me to believe the question wants me to assume the object is following the circular path (lets say clockwise) until it reaches the bottom.

This involves taking an energy based approach to the problem. The energy in a system remains constant by the law of conservation of energy. The object will gain speed (kinetic energy increases, gravitational decreases) as it rotates from top to bottom and then will lose speed as it rotates from the bottom to the top (kinetic energy decreases, gravitational increases). Using these ideas we can find a velocity to work with because the kinetic energy + gravitational energy add up to the total mechanical energy. So first notice that the diameter from the top to the bottom of the circle is going to be ##2r## in length, that is, the height from the top of the circle to the bottom is ##h = 0.50m##.

Using this height, the gravitational energy at the top of the circle can be calculated ##E_G = mgh = 0.49J##.

Now ##E_G → E_K## as the object travels down:

##E_K = (0.5)mv^2##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{2E_K}{m}} = 3.13m/s##

Using this I can easily calculate the tension force from ##F_C = F_T - F_G##. Does this sound reasonable at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:
Now ##E_G → E_K## as the object travels down:

##E_K = (0.5)mv^2##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{2E_K}{m}} = 3.13m/s##

Using this I can easily calculate the tension force from ##F_C = F_T - F_G##. Does this sound reasonable at all?

everything else was perfectly clear, but this part needs a little correction. If you are applying conservation of energy, remember that the object had some velocity/speed at the top. You have to include this while calculating speed at the bottom.

##E_G + E_K = (0.5)mv^2##

the ##E_G## is gravitational potential energy at the top relative to bottom level.
##E_K## is the kinetic energy at the top.
v is the required velocity at the bottom.

and now as you already know, you can calculate tension in the string at the bottom.

Using this I can easily calculate the tension force from ##F_C = F_T - F_G##.
 
NihalSh said:
everything else was perfectly clear, but this part needs a little correction. If you are applying conservation of energy, remember that the object had some velocity/speed at the top. You have to include this while calculating speed at the bottom.

##E_G + E_K = (0.5)mv^2##

the ##E_G## is gravitational potential energy at the top relative to bottom level.
##E_K## is the kinetic energy at the top.
v is the required velocity at the bottom.

and now as you already know, you can calculate tension in the string at the bottom.

Hm, so the kinetic energy at the top of the circular path would be ##E_K = (0.5)mv^2 = (0.5)(0.100)(1.6)^2 = 0.128J##.

Also the gravitational energy at the top would be ##E_G = 0.49J##.

##E_G + E_K = (0.5)mv^2##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{E_G + E_K}{(0.5)(0.100)}} = 3.51m/s##

So the velocity at the bottom would be approx 3.51m/s.
 
Last edited:
Zondrina said:
Hm, so the kinetic energy at the top of the circular path would be ##E_K = (0.5)mv^2 = (0.5)(0.100)(1.6)^2 = 0.128J##.

Also the gravitational energy at the top would be ##E_G = 0.49J##.

##E_G + E_K = (0.5)mv^2##
##v = \sqrt{\frac{E_G + E_K}{0.5m}} = 3.51m/s##

So the velocity at the bottom would be approx 3.51m/s.

yes, exactly. Now figuring out tension is simple enough.
 
NihalSh said:
yes, exactly. Now figuring out tension is simple enough.

Indeed. For completeness I'll post it here:

##F_C = F_T - F_G##
##F_T = \frac{mv^2}{r} + mg = 3.95N##

Only two sig figs allowed, so ##F_T = 4.0N##.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top