Programs Switching majors from Nuclear Engineering to Physics

AI Thread Summary
Switching from Nuclear Engineering to Physics is seen as a viable path, especially for those who feel a stronger affinity for Physics. The discussion highlights concerns about the lack of required Optics classes in the Physics curriculum and whether knowledge in this area is essential for graduate studies. While introductory courses cover basic optics, taking additional classes like Modern Optics can provide valuable reinforcement and practical applications in various fields. Understanding the relevance of Optics in areas such as atomic physics and condensed matter can influence course selection. Ultimately, taking Modern Optics is recommended to enhance preparedness for graduate-level work.
Monocles
Messages
463
Reaction score
2
I'm going to be switching majors from Nuclear Engineering to Physics soon, because I think I really am a Physics guy at heart, but I planned on doing grad school anyways so I could switch over to Nuclear Engineering there if I really wanted to (I've heard that the reverse is harder). Right now I'm looking at my schedule, and there are no Optics classes required, and I'm currently not planning on taking any. Is this a mistake? If I study Physics in grad school will they expect that I have knowledge of Optics? My main reason for wondering this is that there are 6 undergrad Optics classes offered, just none are required.

If so, which Optics classes should I take? The ones offered are:

Geometrical Optics
Geometrical Optics Lab
Modern Optics
Modern Optics Lab
Optical Design
Laser Theory & Application
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think most places expect more optics than you get in your introductory (freshman and sophmore level) courses. That being said there are certain concepts in optics that you'll see in other forms in QM. The reinforcement never hurts. That stuff is all in the modern optics courses (I would guess modern is code for anything discovered after Fresnel). If you're not sure what you'll do graduate work in it is worth noting that there are optical experimental techniques used in atomic and molecular physics, plasma physics and condensed matter physics, so having some of these courses under your belt can save you having to take the courses when you're actually in grad school and trying to get a bunch of other requirements out of the way.
 
Ah, OK, I didn't know about what sorts of applications Optics even had. I'll consider taking Modern Optics in that case. Thanks :)
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top