Symbolism: Bulk-Source Difference Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Turin231
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences in symbolism within circuit schematics, particularly regarding the connection between bulk and source in MOS devices. It highlights a specific layout technique in NMOS design where series transistors are implemented without reverting to a metal layer, saving space and reducing contact failure points. The conversation also addresses how to simulate this behavior in SPICE, suggesting options like leaving terminals unconnected or using a large resistor to model the connection. The importance of understanding these differences in symbolism is emphasized for accurate circuit representation. Overall, the thread provides insights into practical circuit design and simulation techniques.
Turin231
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org


Turin231 said:
[IMG=http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/1997/symbolx.png][/PLAIN]

I was looking at a book with the same symbolism as above on the left and i assumed that the bulk was always connected to the source.Yet at some point i saw this...

http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/8231/whyj.png

Why the difference here?if the default in the symbolism is for the bulk to be connected to the source why is there a difference here?

You can see it below (a NAND gate) - your example is a NOR gate but it's the same thing - a NOR would do what I'm describing for NAND but on the PMOS transistors instead (like your circuit):

There is little layout trick often used in MOS design: implementing series transistors without popping back up to a metal layer. It saves space and is two less contact failure points.

You see this in the NMOS devices (bottom) where the series NMOS transistors are implemented as shown. The green is source-drain implant mask. The red is poly mask for the gate and define the self-aligned source-drain channel boundaries.

Compare this to the parallel PMOS devices on top. Notice that the source of the top NMOS transistor is the drain of the bottom NMOS transistor. The implant for that source-drain node (imagine the rectangle defined by the edges of poly and implant) is floating, ergo, not connected to the substrate or floating like the circuit symbol. Seeing this in the schematic tells you that this layout technique was used.[PLAIN]http://www1bpt.bridgeport.edu/~matanya/images/ict2.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Thanks for the reply.This is actually part of an analog circuit.So to simulate the general behavior o the circuit in a typical schematic cad tool how do I handle this one?
 


The simplest answer is the typical SPICE way: either leave the terminal unconnected if the model allows it or put a large resistor from the node to source or macromodel as a resistor and reverse biased diode.
 
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Electromagnet magnetic field issue'
Hi Guys We are a bunch a mechanical engineers trying to build a simple electromagnet. Our design is based on a very similar magnet. However, our version is about 10 times less magnetic and we are wondering why. Our coil has exactly same length, same number of layers and turns. What is possibly wrong? PIN and bracket are made of iron and are in electrical contact, exactly like the reference design. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. edit: even same wire diameter and coil was wounded by a...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top