Insights Symmetry Arguments and the Infinite Wire with a Current

AI Thread Summary
Symmetry arguments are crucial for understanding the magnetic field around an infinite wire carrying a constant current. The discussion emphasizes that the magnetic field cannot have components in the radial direction or along the wire itself due to these symmetry considerations. It also highlights the importance of transformation properties of vectors, particularly how the magnetic field vector behaves under spatial transformations like rotations and reflections. This analysis is essential for applying Gauss's law analogously to magnetic fields. Overall, the exploration deepens the understanding of magnetic fields in relation to symmetry in physics.
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
22,816
Reaction score
14,870
Many people reading this will be familiar with symmetry arguments related to the use of Gauss law. Finding the electric field around a spherically symmetric charge distribution or around an infinite wire carrying a charge per unit length are standard examples. This Insight explores similar arguments for the magnetic field around an infinite wire carrying a constant current ##I##, which may not be as familiar. In particular, our focus is on the arguments that can be used to conclude that the magnetic field cannot have a component in the radial direction or in the direction of the wire itself.
Transformation properties of vectors
To use symmetry arguments we first need to establish how the magnetic field transforms under different spatial transformations. How it transforms under rotations and reflections will be of particular interest. The magnetic field is described by a vector ##\vec B## with both...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes iamanegg, vanhees71, scottdave and 6 others
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top