I Symmetry transformation in Heisenberg vs Schrödinger Picture

hgandh
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Symmetry transformations are changes in our point of view that preserve the possible outcomes of experiment:
$$\Psi \rightarrow U(\Lambda) \Psi$$
In the Heisenberg picture, observables in a fixed reference frame evolve according to:
$$P(t) = U^\dagger (t)PU(t)$$ while in the Schrodinger picture, the state vector evolves as $$\Psi (t) = U(t) \Psi$$
Now at a time t, we change our reference frame. The expectation value of the observable in the two pictures is then
$$(U(\Lambda) \Psi, P(t)U(\Lambda) \Psi) $$ in the Heisenberg picture and $$(U(\Lambda) \Psi (t), PU(\Lambda) \Psi (t)) $$ in the Schrodinger picture. However, these do not give equivalent values. Can someone point out where my reasoning is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is your symmetry transformation time-independent? I'm guessing it probably is and, if so, then ##U(\Lambda)## commutes with ##U(t)##, leading to equivalent expectation values, afaics.

HTH.
 
strangerep said:
Is your symmetry transformation time-independent? I'm guessing it probably is and, if so, then ##U(\Lambda)## commutes with ##U(t)##, leading to equivalent expectation values, afaics.

HTH.
No it is a general Lorentz transformation. I believe my mistake was the the time evolution operator itself changes in the new reference frame since the Hamiltonian as seen in this new frame is in general not the same as in the original.
$$U(t) \to U(\Lambda)U(t)U^{-1} (\Lambda)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top