System Parameter Estimation with Projection Algorithm

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the impact of input voltage e(t) on the convergence of system parameter estimation using a projection algorithm. The user successfully identified parameters a and b with a sinusoidal input, but encountered issues when using a constant input of e(t)=24. It raises the question of whether different forms of e(t) affect parameter convergence, with responses indicating that varying inputs represent different scenarios that may not yield equally effective identification. The least squares method also produced good results with the constant input, suggesting that the nature of e(t) plays a significant role in parameter estimation. Overall, the effectiveness of parameter convergence is influenced by the characteristics of the input signal.
rfrederic
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am recently trying to identify system parameters with projection algorithm, but faced a problem, and the dynamic model is the following:
\ddot{y}(t)+a\cdot\dot{y}(t)=b\cdot e(t)

The true value of a is 2.8, b is 0.1.

While inputing volt e(t)=12sin(2\pi t)+5sin(2t), I can get a good result showed in 1c_PA_r0.1_a0.jpg, and both of a and b are convergent to the true value.

But while e(t)=24, the result showed in doesn't seem right.

My question is: will e(t) affect the convergence of parameters? And why?
By the way, I had also tried to use the least square to identify parameters while e(t)=24, the result also seems good.
 

Attachments

  • 1c_PA_r0.1_a0.jpg
    1c_PA_r0.1_a0.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 493
  • 1b_PA_r0.1_a0.jpg
    1b_PA_r0.1_a0.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 397
Engineering news on Phys.org
rfrederic said:
will e(t)e(t)e(t) affect the convergence of parameters? And why?
Why not? Different e(t) are different cases. There is no reason to expect that all cases are equally easy to identify.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top