Tangential and radial acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the accelerations of masses attached to a swinging triangle pivoted at one vertex. The initial confusion stems from the solution stating that radial accelerations are zero since the velocity is zero at the start. It is clarified that while there is no radial acceleration due to the fixed lengths of the rods, centripetal forces still exist but do not cause acceleration. The suggestion is made to analyze the system as a physical pendulum to determine angular acceleration first. This approach helps reconcile the concepts of tangential and radial acceleration in the context of the problem.
magnas
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am reviewing a problem with the associated solution and there is something i don t understand.
Imagine a triangle with vertices l, masses m are attached to the two end of the vertices and on the top end vertice there is a pivot so that the triangle can swing. We start with the triangle at rest and one of the rod is vertical.
Question: what is the accelerations of the masses (the two following words are in italics) just after it is released?
What i don t understand is the following:
"since v=0 at the start , the radial accelerations are zero"(quote from the solution). And then, the problem is treated as there is no radial acceleration at all, while considering a tangential acceleration. How can we consider a tangential acceleration without a radial/centripetal acceleration?
If this is possible, could you explain me and clarify with an example?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
magnas said:
Hi,
I am reviewing a problem with the associated solution and there is something i don t understand.
Imagine a triangle with vertices l, masses m are attached to the two end of the vertices and on the top end vertice there is a pivot so that the triangle can swing. We start with the triangle at rest and one of the rod is vertical.
Question: what is the accelerations of the masses (the two following words are in italics) just after it is released?
What i don t understand is the following:
"since v=0 at the start , the radial accelerations are zero"(quote from the solution). And then, the problem is treated as there is no radial acceleration at all, while considering a tangential acceleration. How can we consider a tangential acceleration without a radial/centripetal acceleration?
If this is possible, could you explain me and clarify with an example?
Thank you.

So you have something that looks like this?
attachment.php?attachmentid=53984&stc=1&d=1355690605.gif


If the 'rods' forming the triangle are of fixed length, then the masses are constrained to follow the circular arc indicated, and there's no change in length of r possible. So no radial acceleration. This is not to say that centripetal forces will not happen, just that they cannot make the masses accelerate due to the fixed lengths of the triangle.

It's like a book lying on a table; There's a gravitational force acting on it, and g is still in business, but still the book does not move downwards.

You might consider treating the object as a physical pendulum and determine its angular acceleration first.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.9 KB · Views: 594
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top