Tangential velocity of the earth

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the tangential velocity required for the Earth to rotate such that a person at the equator would weigh three-quarters of their normal weight. The subject area includes concepts of rotational motion and forces acting on a body in circular motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a relationship between the forces acting on a person at the equator and the required tangential velocity. They express concern over a sign error leading to a negative square root in their calculations. Other participants question the definitions and relationships used in the equations, particularly regarding the normal force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the equations involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct formulation of the equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information available or the methods that can be used. There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions of the normal force in different states of the problem.

RTW69
Messages
374
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Determine the speed with which the Earth would have to turn to rotate on its axis so that a person on the equator would weigh 3/4 as much


Homework Equations


VT=r*ω ; Vi=469 m/s is tangential velocity of earth

ƩF=M*ac=m*Vt^2/r



The Attempt at a Solution



The positive direction is toward the center of the earth.

From ƩF=m*ac

Initial: m*g-Ni=m*Vi^2/r

Final: 3/4m*g-Nf=m*Vf^2/r

Since m*g is the same for initial and final state I assume that Ni=Nf

Therefore:3/4m*g-[mg-m*Vi^2/r]=m*Vf^2/r or

Vf=Sqrt(Vi^2-r*g/4)

I have a sign error. I end up taking the square root of a negative number but the physics looks OK. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nf is to be 3/4 of what? And what equation tells you what it will actually be? (Your 'Final' equation is completely wrong.)
 
OK, Final:m*g-3/4*N=m*Vf^2/r
 
Looks right, if N is what you wrote as Ni previously,
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K