Tarzan swings down to save Jane

  • Thread starter Thread starter dkgojackets
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Tarzan, with a mass of 98.3552 kg, is attempting to rescue Jane, who weighs 57.5336 kg, by swinging from a 30.1 m vine from a 4.45 m cliff. The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for Tarzan to complete the swing after determining his speed at the lowest point (9.339 m/s) and the height of the other side (1.7714 m). Participants suggest using kinematics and concepts of simple harmonic motion to analyze the swing dynamics, considering both the downward and upward motions separately. The importance of energy conservation in determining initial speeds is highlighted, making the calculations more manageable. The conversation focuses on applying these physics principles to find the total time for the rescue.
dkgojackets
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Tarzan (mass 98.3552) stands on a 4.45 m cliff next to a river. He grabs a vine of length 30.1 m whose point of support is directly above Jane (mass 57.5336). He grabs Jane at the bottom of his swing and has just enough speed to make it to the other side. How long does the rescue take?

Homework Equations



I assume some kinematics.

The Attempt at a Solution



I already solved the other two parts (Tarzans speed at bottom (9.339 m/s)and height of other side (1.7714 m). I triedd d = .5at^2 for both sides of the swing (down and back up) but didn't expect it to be right. It probably has something to do with harmonic motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can see simple harmonic motion working here. divide it into two parts with separate values for omega (in the SHM, not omega of the rope). Not too hard to do for the first part because you know the final speed. set that equal to (omega)(amplitude) where amp is the max angle. For the second part, do it the same way, but first calculate the initial speed by using energy conservation. Can you go from there?
 
on second thought, I guess you already know that initial speed because you used momentum to find the height of the other side. That makes it easier.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top