Taylor Approximation Proof for P(r) using Series Expansion

essif
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Taylor approximation

Homework Statement


I have an exact funktion given as:

P(r)=1-e^{\frac{-2r}{a}}(1+\frac{2r}{a}+\frac{2r^2}{a^2})

I need to prove, by making a tayler series expansion, that:
P(r)\approx \frac{3r^3}{4a^4}

When r \prec \prec a


The Attempt at a Solution


I am lost when it comes to these Taylor approximations. It should be a fairly easy problem, but don't know how to handle it.
Some help on how to do this would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the Taylor series of a function f(r) around 0 is given by
f(r) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!} f^{(n)}(0) r^n = f(0) + f'(0) r + 1/2 f''(0) r^2 + 1/6 f'''(0) r^3 + 1/24 f''''(0) r^4 + \cdots
where f^{(n)} denotes the nth derivative. Usually, one stops the expansion after a certain number of terms (e.g. f(r) \approx f(0) is the "first order expansion", including the first derivative term gives the "second order expansion", etc.*)

So basically, all you need to do for this problem is construct the Taylor series (you'll need to calculate the derivatives) and terminate it at a proper point. Or alternatively, if you know the expansion of the exponential, you can plug it in, expand the brackets, and again terminate it somewhere (that is, neglect all powers r^n, r^{n+1}, r^{n+2}, etc. for an nth order expansion).

*) I also see people calling f(0) the zero'th order expansion, f'(0) r the first order, etc. Sometimes that is confusing but so be it[/size]
 
Thanks for the quick reply

By expanding the exponential to fourth order I was able to find the desired result
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top