Taylor Polynomial with Remainder Question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimal degree Taylor polynomial needed to approximate sin(1) to specific decimal places of accuracy. The context involves understanding Taylor series, remainder terms, and error analysis in approximations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of sin(1) using Taylor series and question how to determine the necessary degree of the polynomial for desired accuracy. Some suggest computing terms of the series one-by-one and consider the implications of truncation error in alternating series.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their attempts and questioning their understanding of the requirements for accuracy. Some guidance has been provided regarding the error thresholds for different decimal places, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the use of calculators, with some participants expressing confusion over the manual computation required for the assignments. The discussion also touches on the definitions of accuracy in terms of error margins for decimal places.

JustinLiang
Messages
79
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the minimal degree Taylor polynomial about x=0 that you need to calculate sin(1) to 3 decimal places? 6 decimal places?

Homework Equations


R_nx = f^(n+1)(c)(x-a)^(n+1)/(n+1)(factorial)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have attached my attempt. I am stuck on the last step, how do I solve for n? Did I even do it right up until now?
 

Attachments

  • photo (5).jpg
    photo (5).jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 1,100
Physics news on Phys.org
JustinLiang said:

Homework Statement


What is the minimal degree Taylor polynomial about x=0 that you need to calculate sin(1) to 3 decimal places? 6 decimal places?

Homework Equations


R_nx = f^(n+1)(c)(x-a)^(n+1)/(n+1)(factorial)

The Attempt at a Solution


I have attached my attempt. I am stuck on the last step, how do I solve for n? Did I even do it right up until now?

A MUCH easier way is to start computing the terms of sin(1) one-by-one, and noting that you have an alternating series. What do you know about the "truncation" (remainder) error in an alternating series?

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
A MUCH easier way is to start computing the terms of sin(1) one-by-one, and noting that you have an alternating series. What do you know about the "truncation" (remainder) error in an alternating series?

RGV

But don't you need a calculator for that? You would have to calculate sin1 and compare your approximations to see the difference (remainder).
 
JustinLiang said:
But don't you need a calculator for that? You would have to calculate sin1 and compare your approximations to see the difference (remainder).

No, you don't need to know the value of sin(1)---remember, sin(1) is the thing that you are trying to compute!

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
No, you don't need to know the value of sin(1)---remember, sin(1) is the thing that you are trying to compute!

RGV

Wow, I totally misread the question... Ok so now I have

Pn(x) = x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! - x^7/7! + x^9/9! - x^11/11! + ...
Pn(1) = 1 - 1/6 + 1/120 - 1/5040 + 1/362880

How do I know which is 3 decimal and 6 decimal places without a calculator?
 
JustinLiang said:
Wow, I totally misread the question... Ok so now I have

Pn(x) = x - x^3/3! + x^5/5! - x^7/7! + x^9/9! - x^11/11! + ...
Pn(1) = 1 - 1/6 + 1/120 - 1/5040 + 1/362880

How do I know which is 3 decimal and 6 decimal places without a calculator?

Are you not allowed to use a calculator to do simple addition, subtraction and division? if not, then welcome to the world of manual computation from 50 years ago: this CAN be done by hand, but it is unpleasant.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
Are you not allowed to use a calculator to do simple addition, subtraction and division? if not, then welcome to the world of manual computation from 50 years ago: this CAN be done by hand, but it is unpleasant.

RGV

Haha, our prof said we don't need a calculator for his course. But it seems like we do for the assignments.

Back to the question... I am still somewhat clueless. First off, when they said 3 decimals places, would that mean <10^-2? It seems like the 7th derivative at 1/5040 would be a plausible answer but the answer key says 6... What do I do :S
 
JustinLiang said:
Haha, our prof said we don't need a calculator for his course. But it seems like we do for the assignments.

Back to the question... I am still somewhat clueless. First off, when they said 3 decimals places, would that mean <10^-2? It seems like the 7th derivative at 1/5040 would be a plausible answer but the answer key says 6... What do I do :S

No. Three-decimal places of accuracy require an |error| < 0.5*10^-4 = 1/2000, so stopping at the term -1/5040 will do (but be sure to INCLUDE that term). Six decimals of accuracy need an |error| < 0.5x10^-7 = 1/20,000,000, so you can figure out where you have to stop the series.

RGV
 
JustinLiang said:
Haha, our prof said we don't need a calculator for his course. But it seems like we do for the assignments.

Back to the question... I am still somewhat clueless. First off, when they said 3 decimals places, would that mean <10^-2? It seems like the 7th derivative at 1/5040 would be a plausible answer but the answer key says 6... What do I do :S

No. Three-decimal places of accuracy require an |error| < 0.5*10^-4 = 1/20,000, so stopping at the term -1/362,880 will do (but be sure to INCLUDE that term). Six decimals of accuracy need an |error| < 0.5x10^-7 = 1/20,000,000, so you can figure out where you have to stop the series.

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K