Taylor Series for ln(1-x): Get Help Now

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the Taylor series for ln(1-x) and its representation as a sum. Participants suggest using the Taylor series method, but one points out that this may not be appropriate for the precalculus context. An alternative approach using geometric series is proposed, highlighting the formula for summing a geometric series and suggesting integration to achieve the desired result. However, concerns are raised about the appropriateness of integration in a precalculus setting. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of balancing advanced mathematical concepts with the limitations of precalculus knowledge.
teng125
Messages
416
Reaction score
0
may i know from ln(1-x) how to become - [infinity (sum) k=1] x^k / k ?
pls help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You posted this in the "precalculus section" so I assume you wouldn't be able to use "Taylor Series". That's the only way I know to show it.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You posted this in the "precalculus section" so I assume you wouldn't be able to use "Taylor Series". That's the only way I know to show it.
Uhmm, I think it can also be done with geometric series:
\sum_{i = 0} ^ \infty (a r ^ i) = \frac{a}{1 - r}, \quad |r| < 1.
So if your final sum is:
\frac{1}{1 - k}, what should your geometric series look like? Then integrating that should give you the result you want (remember to choose the appropriate C, i.e the constant of integration).
 
VietDao29 said:
Uhmm, I think it can also be done with geometric series:
\sum_{i = 0} ^ \infty (a r ^ i) = \frac{a}{1 - r}, \quad |r| < 1.
So if your final sum is:
\frac{1}{1 - k}, what should your geometric series look like? Then integrating that should give you the result you want (remember to choose the appropriate C, i.e the constant of integration).
I thought about that but then integrating is not "pre-calculus" either!
 
Back
Top