Taylor Series/Radius of Convergence - I just need a hint

  • Thread starter Thread starter DivGradCurl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Taylor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the radius of convergence for the Taylor series of the function f(x) = 1 + x + x^2 centered at 2. The initial confusion arises from a misinterpretation of the series, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the radius of convergence is 1. It is clarified that all coefficients b_n for n > 2 are zero, indicating that the series is a polynomial and thus converges for all x. The n-th root test confirms that the series converges everywhere, reinforcing that the radius of convergence is indeed infinite. The function being a polynomial explains its convergence across all real numbers.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
Consider the following:

f(x) = 1 + x + x^2 = 7 + 5 (x-2) + (x-2)^2

which is a Taylor series centered at 2. My question is: what is the radius of convergence? The answer in my book is R=\infty, but take a look at this:

f(x) = 7 + 5 (x-2) + (x-2)^2 = \sum _{n=0} ^{\infty} b_n (x-2)^n \Longrightarrow \left| x-2 \right| < 1

Then, I get

1 \leq x \leq 3 \Longrightarrow R = \frac{3-1}{2}=1 \neq \infty

In other words, I'm a bit confused!

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your confusion is that the b_n are ALL 0 for n > 2. There's nothing to test since the series is perfectly well defined for all x. You might try, for example, comparing the terms in your series with the terms in a series you know converges for all x such as e^{-x^2}. Clearly, for n > 2 each term of your series is smaller than the corresponding term in the latter expansion.
 
It looks like you tried to use the ratio test, but you can't because you need to find the limit of 0/0.

However, you can apply the n-th root test, which will, indeed, say that it converges for all x. (as it should because the function is a polynomial which exists for all x!)
 
It makes sense now.

Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top