Taylor Series: Show Terms Decay as 1/n^2

optics101
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Show that, with an appropriate choice of constant c, the taylor series of

(1+cx)ln(1+x)

has terms which decay as 1/n^2

I know that ln(1+x) decays as 1/n, but I don't know how to show the above. Please help.

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It's against the forum rules to post the exactly same question in two different subforums. You should delete one of them.
 
My apologies, I am just beginning to use this forum. I did not know how to delete them, so I just cleared the content within the others.
 
The other copies are now deleted.
 
optics101 said:
My apologies, I am just beginning to use this forum. I did not know how to delete them, so I just cleared the content within the others.

By the way, welcome to the forum and I'm sorry I got a bit snippy there. I tend to do that (this is not a forum for the thinskinned) without thinking about significant things like, hey you're new here.

What's even worse is that after giving you a hard time I can't even answer your question. Fortunately for you, not everyone here is as useless as I am.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top