Technical question about loop corrections

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the implications of gauge invariance in quantum field theory, specifically regarding the one-loop corrections represented by the equation $Πμνϒϒ(0) = ΠμνϒZ(0) = 0$. The photon propagator is defined with a gauge-dependent term, and the renormalization condition $\Pi(q^2=0)=0$ is established to ensure the photon remains massless. The conversation highlights the importance of the Ward-Takahashi identity and the need to manage infrared divergences by selecting an appropriate renormalization point in the space-like region.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge invariance in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with one-loop corrections and polarization tensors
  • Knowledge of the Ward-Takahashi identity
  • Concepts of renormalization and infrared divergences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of gauge invariance in quantum electrodynamics
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the Ward-Takahashi identity
  • Research techniques for handling infrared divergences in quantum field theory
  • Explore the role of renormalization points in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum field theorists, and advanced students studying particle physics, particularly those interested in gauge theories and renormalization techniques.

Worldsheep
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know a simple explanation for the following statement:

Gauge invariance ⇒ $Πμνϒϒ(0) = ΠμνϒZ(0) = 0$

Where ΠVV' is the V to V' one loop correction, ϒ is the photon field and Z is the Z-boson field. The argument of Π is the incoming momentum q2 = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your photon propagator is
$$D_{\mu \nu}(q)=-\frac{1}{q^2-q^2 \Pi(q^2)+\mathrm{i} 0^+}[g_{\mu \nu}-q_{\mu} q_{\nu}] + A(q^2) q^{\mu} q^{\nu},$$
where ##A(q^2)## is a gauge-dependent non-interacting piece, which doesn't enter any physical result.

Now the photon has strictly 0 mass. Together with the Ward-Takahashi identity of the photon polarization tensor, which makes it purely 4-transverse, this implies that
$$\Pi_{\mu \nu}=q^2 \Pi(q^2) (g_{\mu \nu}-q_{\mu} q_{\nu}).$$
##\Pi## is a logarithmically divergent scalar. Now to make the residuum of the photon propgator 1 at ##q^2=0##, you impose the renormalization condition
$$\Pi(q^2=0)=0.$$
The same argument holds for the ##\gamma##-Z mixing piece too.

Note that the above renormalization condition is dangerous with regard to infrared divergences, which must be resummed. For this purpose it's better to choose the renormalization point in the space-like.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K