Tedious Algebra- Is it needed? - Coulomb Force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the complexity of algebraic problems involving Coulomb's law, specifically finding the position of a third charge to achieve a desired net force. Participants emphasize that these problems test students' understanding of electrostatic forces and the vector nature of Coulomb interactions. While some educators find the algebra challenging for students, they acknowledge that such exercises help develop a deeper grasp of the principles involved. Clarity in terminology and problem setup is crucial to prevent confusion, particularly regarding the interpretation of coordinates and distances. Overall, despite the algebraic difficulties, these problems are deemed valuable for reinforcing fundamental concepts in electrostatics.
Gamma
Messages
355
Reaction score
11
Hello,


A typical problem assigned to students is where there are two charges on the x-axis and find the location of a third charge so that the net force on it is zero or some other force value given. I am wondering what is the idea behind this problem? It can get really complicated when trying to solve this. Or is there another way to solve it easily? Here is an example:

A 3 uC charge is at the origin, a -5 uC charge is at +0.2 m. Find the location of an +8 uC charge so that the net force on the 8 uC charge is -7 N


We can place the 8 uC charge on the negative side say at x m from the origin.
Then we can find the net force on 8 uC and then set it to - 7 N.

This is what I am getting.

-3 /x^2 + 5/(x+0.2)^2 = - 97.2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the main reason for these types of questions is to test students understanding of electrostatic forces and the interaction between differently charged particles. After this type of problem is introduced, the 3rd charge is generally then placed somewhere above or below the other two charges so that now x and y forces have to be taken into consideration. I'm sure this is to test students ability to break down the net force into its x and y components and add them respectively. Yes, it can be a lot of algebra, but it does help to develop a students overall understanding of these forces and principles.
 
These problems help the students to understand the vector nature of Coulomb force. When the charges are along a straight line, the students have to decide where the third charge can be, and use different equations in the different domains.
In your problem, the third charge can be either at x<0 or x>0.2 m. You took only the first case into account.

ehild
 
Right, we could place the charge on the other end also. To give a complete solution, students have to solve both of these scenarios.

The students that am teaching are extremely challenged in math, so I don't assign them these type of problems. If I assign them, I might ask them to derive the equation and stop short of solving it. I just could not take the muttering that goes on the next day in the class.
 
The equations assigned to problems "where is the force zero on the third charge" is easy to solve.

The students learn that Coulomb force is "F=kQ1Q2/r^2", and are confused both by the direction of F and the meaning of "r" when there are two forces from two charges. You need to remind them the wording of the Coulomb Law "The force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the point charges", so they have to use the distance D for "r".
Such problems also help them to understand what is the distance between two points placed at given coordinates and how to define the position of a point charge. You said "We can place the 8 uC charge on the negative side say at x m from the origin". That can confuse the students as they get a positive number although x, as coordinate, is negative. It is better to say "at distance D1 from the first charge" and "at distance D2 from the negative charge" and they need to understand that Di=|x-xi| where xi is the position (coordinate) of the i-th charge.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top