Telescope Magnification: Calculating Linear Magnification and Magnifying Power

AI Thread Summary
A telescope with a 50 cm focal length objective and a 5 cm focal length eyepiece is analyzed for its linear magnification and magnifying power. The linear magnification is defined as the ratio of the height of the image to the height of the object, while magnifying power refers to angular magnification, which is the ratio of the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece. The calculated magnification is 10x, but confusion arises as the book states the magnifying power is 16. The discussion highlights the need to apply the lens formula for accurate calculations, especially when the object is not at a significant distance. Clarification on the distinction between linear magnification and magnifying power is emphasized throughout the conversation.
Amith2006
Messages
416
Reaction score
2
Please help!
# A telescope has an objective of focal length 50 cm and an eye piece of focal length 5 cm. It is focused for distinct vision on a scale 200 cm away from the objective. What is the linear magnification of the telescope numerically? Also what is the magnifying power of the telescope numerically?
Could someone tell me, if linear magnification of the telescope different from magnifying power of the telescope? I think they both mean the same. I have this doubt because 2 different answers are given in my book for linear magnification and magnifying power of the telescope.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oddly, I've never actually heard the term "linear magnification." The magnification of the telescope is just the focal length of the objective divided by the focal length of the eyepiece. Therefore, this telescope-eyepiece system achieves a magnification of 10x.

- Warren
 
I think...
The linear magnification is the ratio of the length of the image to the length of object.

This is called in such a way because some times we find the ratio of the area of image to the area of object this is called aerial magnification which is square of the linear magnification.

The linear magnification hear is not fo/fe because the object (200 cm.) is not at very large distance and the rays, from a point of the object, can not be considered parallel. You have to apply the lens formula to find the object distance and the image distance for the distance of the image from the optical center of objective and so on... This is not simply fo as in the case if the object is at long distance. Try this and you will learn automatically.
 
There is a word linear magnification in physics in terms of optical instruments. It is a unitless number that is the ratio of the height of the image and the height of the object.

Additionally, I think you are talking about the angular magnification of the telescope for the magnifying power. Angular magnification is different for linear magnification.


WDJr
 
Last edited:
According to my Physics 11 textbook, linear magnification is "the ratio of the size of an image to the size of the object". I'm not so sure about the term "magnifying power". WDJr seems to be correct:

"The angular size of the virtual image seen by the observer will be larger than the actual angular size of the object. The ratio of these two sizes is the magnifying power and is equal to the ratio of the focal lengths of the objective and ocular."
-- http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0861462.html
 
Last edited:
I solved it in following way:
Assuming it to be an astronomical telescope and the final image is formed at the least distance of distinct vision(D). Let f(o) & f(e) be the focal length of objective and eye piece. We know that,
Magnifying power = Angular Magnification = [f(o)/f(e)]{1 + f(e)/D}
= (50/5){1 + 5/25}
= 12
Is it right? But the answer given in my book is 16.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top