Telescope Resolution for AGN Accretion Disk

AI Thread Summary
To resolve the accretion disk of an Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) at distances of 3.3 million parsecs, one must calculate the required telescope diameter using the angular resolution formula. The diameter of the accretion disk is 2 parsecs, and the calculations involve using the wavelength of observation, specifically at 10 μm and 21 cm. The parallax formula is deemed unnecessary since both distance and diameter are provided in parsecs. Instead, the focus should be on determining the angular extent and applying the diffraction limit formula. The discussion concludes with clarification on the use of the 1.22 factor, emphasizing it represents the half angle for the source.
wtaylor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Telescope Resolution

Homework Statement


An Active Galactic Nucleus (AGN) is fueled by gas and dust in a rotating
accretion disk that is streaming onto a supermassive black hole in the center of the
galaxy. These accretion disks are typically a few pc in diameter and are best detected
at long wavelengths (to penetrate the dusty envelopes of these galactic centres). One
of the nearest AGNs is 3.3x106 pc from Earth and is powered by an accretion disk
that is 2 pc in diameter.
a) What size telescope would you need to resolve this accretion
disk at a wavelength of 10 μm and also at 21cm?

Homework Equations


p(′′) = 1/D(pc)

θ (") = 2.5 × 10^5 λ/D

The Attempt at a Solution


The only way I can see to find this is to use the parallax equation to find the size of the accretion disk in " and then use the angular resolution formula to find the telescopes diameter using each wavelength. But I am not sure if this will work considering that seems like an improper use of the parallax formula. Could someone give me a hint as to whether I am going in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need the paralax formula since the distance and diameter are both given in parsec. You just need to work out the angular extent and then use 1.22 lambda/D for the diffraction limit, at 10um telescopes are pretty much diffraction limited.
 
Awesome, got it. Thanks alot.
 
Carefull, the 1.22 factor is the half angle (ie the radius of the source)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top