Temperature CONFUSION in derivation for Helmholtz Free Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the temperature variable 'T' in the derivation of Helmholtz Free Energy (A) from the second law of thermodynamics. The user struggles to determine whether 'T' refers to the system's temperature or that of the surroundings, as both interpretations lead to contradictions in calculating total entropy change. The user highlights that standard texts suggest 'T' should be the system's temperature, yet this leads to an inconsistency in deriving A. The core issue is reconciling the relationship between the system's internal energy and the entropy of both the system and surroundings. Clarification is sought on the appropriate temperature to use in the context of entropy calculations and Helmholtz Free Energy derivation.
daniel_r35
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I have been spending 12 hours on this and cannot seem to come up with a solution.

We derive Helmholtz Free Energy (A) from the second law of thermodynamics.

dS(Total) = dS(system) + dS(surrounds)

we try to express dS(surrounds) with properties of the system.

Assuming constant volume (so q=W) and constant temperature (WHICH AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND it means that the system and surrounds each remain at their original temperatures but CAN HAVE DEIFFERENT temperatures - which they must if not dS(Total) is zero and you can't derive A),

so we get dS(surrounds) = -dU(system)/T...Now NOBODY, not my books, not the internet, NOBODY!says what 'T' is! THEY SAY IT'S the ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE! But is it that of the SYSTEM or SURROUNDS?!

If it WAS THE SYSTEM, then it WILL NOT MAKE SENSE, because:

dS(system) is ALREADY +dU(system)/Tsystem.

if you say dS(surrounds) is -dU(system)/Tsystem then dS(total) = ZERO and you can't prove A because A = -TdS!

IF it WAS THE SURROUNDS, IT STILL DOESN'T MAKE SENSE:

because we will get A = -TdS(Total) = dU(system) - T(surrounds).dS(system)

What on Earth will Tsurrounds.dSsystem get you?!

EVERY BOOK will say in Helmholtz free energy, we have expressed it in terms of the internal energy of the system and the TEMPERATURE OF THE SYSTEM! (As though they MEANT for the Temperature to be of the system and not the surrounds)!

but based on my knowledge of entropy shouldn't it be temperature of surrounds, because the entropy of the surrounds should be the heat exchanged AT THAT TEMPERATURE belonging to the surrounds?! we know the heat exchanged is -dUsystem. No doubt about that. But what about T?! Either case doesn't work!

PLEASE! HELP ME!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Let me quote from D.V. Schroeder, Thermal Physics (Addison Wesley Longman, 2000):
[The Helholtz free energy] is the total energy needed to create the system, minus the heat you can get for free from an environment at temperature ##T##.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top