Tennis serve bounce - spin doubles, speed halfs, why?

AI Thread Summary
A tennis ball experiences a significant reduction in speed after bouncing, often dropping to about half its initial speed due to aerodynamic drag and court surface effects. High-speed serves, such as those reaching 130 mph, can slow to around 70 mph upon return. The type of court surface plays a crucial role, with slower surfaces causing greater speed loss. Advances in string technology have allowed for increased topspin on serves, particularly second serves, which mitigates some speed loss after the bounce. Unlike table tennis, the spin on a tennis ball does not exceed its initial speed, except for backspin shots.
Skhandelwal
Messages
400
Reaction score
3
First of all, can someone delete my table tennis post? Second, why does a tennis ball in a serve right after it bounces reduces its speed to half and increases its spin to double?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The speed isn't lost by half, but it does slow down a lot. I remember reading that a tennis ball from a flat high speed serve leaving the racket at 130mph, is down to 70mph by the time it's struck by the returning player, aerodynamic drag is part of this, and the bounce off the court is the rest. A "slow" court surface slows the ball down more than a "fast" court surface.

With the new string technology, serves have more topspin than before, especially second serves, and the speed loss from the bounce is not as great. Unlike table tennis, the surface speed of the ball from spin won't be faster than the speed of the ball, except for backspin (slice) shots.

I responded to your table tennis post, it might be interesting to some here.
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
12K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top