Solving the Tension Equation: Understanding the Progression

  • Thread starter Thread starter msudawgs267
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the transition from the equation Sum of F = Ft - mg to v = √((Ft - mg)r/m) in a tension problem. The confusion arises from the use of mg in one part and v squared in another. Clarification is provided that the left side represents Newton's second law, where the sum of forces equals mass times acceleration. The acceleration is expressed as centripetal acceleration (ma = mv²/r), allowing for the derivation of v. This explanation highlights the connection between force, tension, and centripetal motion in solving the problem.
msudawgs267
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question about this equation (link below). I am working on a tension problem and I don't understand how you go from Sum of F= Ft-mg to
v= [square root of] (Ft-mg)r /m

The progression from one to the other is confusing me. I don't see how can use (mg) in one part of the equation and in the next part it is (v)squared and the back to (mg) at the end.


http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/4830/equationi.jpg


I hope my question was not written too unclear and any help would be amazing. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi msudawgs267,

msudawgs267 said:
I have a question about this equation (link below). I am working on a tension problem and I don't understand how you go from Sum of F= Ft-mg to
v= [square root of] (Ft-mg)r /m

The progression from one to the other is confusing me. I don't see how can use (mg) in one part of the equation and in the next part it is (v)squared and the back to (mg) at the end.

I would not say the expression on the left is progression from one step to another. The starting point is Newton's law in the form:

<br /> \sum F = m a<br />

and then they are saying that

<br /> \sum F \to F_T - mg<br />

and

<br /> m a \to m\frac{v^2}{r} \ \ \ \mbox{(for centripetal acceleration)}<br />

Setting these two new expressions equal to each other and solving for v gives the answer.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top