Finding Tension in a Rotating Ring: A Constant or Changing Value?

AI Thread Summary
The tension in a rotating ring can be calculated using the formula T = ρAω²r², where ρ is density, A is the area of cross-section, ω is angular velocity, and r is the radius. The analysis involves considering a small segment of the ring and applying Newton's second law to derive the relationship between tension and centripetal force. The symmetry of the forces allows for the conclusion that the tension is constant throughout the ring, as the angles involved lead to equal tensions at both ends of the segment. The cancellation of cos(dθ) occurs as dθ approaches zero, simplifying the calculations. The existence of tension is necessary to provide the centripetal force required for circular motion, confirming that each particle experiences a pulling force from adjacent segments.
andyrk
Messages
658
Reaction score
5
How do we find out the tension in a rotating ring of density ρ, radius r which is rotating with an angular velocity of ω and area of cross section A? And how do we know that this tension would be constant throughout the ring?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
andyrk said:
How do we find out the tension in a rotating ring of density ρ, radius r which is rotating with an angular velocity of ω and area of cross section A? And how do we know that this tension would be constant throughout the ring?

Pick out a very small segment of the ring, calculate its radial acceleration. You have the acceleration of that segment and you have its mass, so you should be able to calculate the net force on it. The only forces acting on that segment come from the tension in the ring.
 
Okay. Help me a bit on this. Let's pick an element of length dx. Then volume of this element is Adx and mass of this element is ρAdx. So the momentum of this particle is ρAdx(rω). How do we go about calculating the tension or even some force from here?
 
Let the tension be \vec{T_1} , \vec{T_2} at the two edges of dx. Then suppose d\theta is the angle between T1 and dx (same as between T2 and dx due to symmetry). Because there is no tangential acceleration it will be T_1cos(d\theta)-T_2cos(d\theta)=0 from which T_1=T_2=T because cos(d\theta)\to 1. Now what holds for the force T_1sin(d\theta)+T_2sin(d\theta)=2Tsin(d\theta)? (in what follows you should take notice that sin(d\theta)=\frac{dx}{2R})
 
Delta² said:
Let the tension be \vec{T_1} , \vec{T_2} at the two edges of dx. Then suppose d\theta is the angle between T1 and dx (same as between T2 and dx due to symmetry). Because there is no tangential acceleration it will be T_1cos(d\theta)-T_2cos(d\theta)=0 from which T_1=T_2=T because cos(d\theta)\to 1. Now what holds for the force T_1sin(d\theta)+T_2sin(d\theta)=2Tsin(d\theta)? (in what follows you should take notice that sin(d\theta)=\frac{dx}{2R})
That T_1sin(d\theta)+T_2sin(d\theta)=2Tsin(d\theta) is the centripetal force and it should be equal to dmω2r = ρAdxω2r ⇒ 2Tdx/2r = ρAdxω2r ⇒ T = ρAω2r2.

But why is sindθ = dx/2R? Is it because of (dx/2)/R, i.e. we consider half the length of the element while measuring the sine of the angle because the triangle made involves only half the length dx and not full dx? Can you draw a diagram for this please? Also , does cosdθ → 1 or does it just cancel out? Also, how can we be so sure that the tension would exist, i.e. how can we say that each of the particles would definitely experience a pulling force from either side?
 
Last edited:
Sorry i can't draw a diagram. It is because the triangle made when we take the vertical from the center of the circle to dx, cuts dx in the middle. The angle made by the radius r and this vertical l is d\theta because the sides of this angle are perpendicular to the sides of d\theta(radius r is perpendicular to T_1 and l is perpendicular to dx, and angles with perpendicular sides are equal). cos(d\theta) cancels out because we know as d\theta \to 0, cos(d\theta) \to 1. The tension has to exist , otherwise we would have centripetal acceleration without centripetal force, that is violation of Newton's 2nd law.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top