Test Convergence: Sum of i^n/n | Chris Maness

  • Thread starter Thread starter kq6up
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Test
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the convergence of the series ∑(i^n/n) and the application of the integral test. Chris Maness initially concludes that separating the series into real and imaginary parts leads to divergence, but Wolfram Alpha indicates it converges to -log(1-i). Participants clarify that splitting the series into real and imaginary components can lead to incorrect conclusions if not handled properly, particularly regarding rearrangement of terms. The Riemann rearrangement theorem is mentioned, emphasizing that conditionally convergent series can yield different results based on term order. Ultimately, Chris acknowledges the misunderstanding about the nature of the series' terms and recognizes that the series converges by the alternating series test.
kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Test to see if \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{ i^n/n } converges.

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



If I separate this series into real/imag. parts both series diverges by the integral test. However, according to Wolfram Alpha, the series converges to \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{ i^n/n }= -log(1-i)

What test would I use to show this converges, and how did I misuse the integral test?

Thanks,
Chris Maness
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sum of the first four terms is
$$i - 1/2 - i/3 + 1/4 = -1/4 + 2i/3$$
Try finding a general expression for the sum of the four terms starting at, say, ##n = 4k+1## and see what you can conclude.
 
jbunniii said:
The sum of the first four terms is
$$i - 1/2 - i/3 + 1/4 = -1/4 + 2i/3$$
Try finding a general expression for the sum of the four terms starting at, say, ##n = 4k+1## and see what you can conclude.

I split it into real and imaginary sums and used the integral test. However, I am not sure what you mean by the above statement.

Chris KQ6UP
 
kq6up said:
I split it into real and imaginary sums and used the integral test. However, I am not sure what you mean by the above statement.
If you split it into real and imaginary sums then you get two alternating series, so they both converge. Can you show how you applied the integral test?

Also, be very careful about "splitting into real and imaginary sums". In general, if you rearrange the order of the terms in a series, the result may not be the same as the original series. Rearrangement can only be done safely in general if the convergence is absolute, which is not the case here.

Indeed, a very interesting theorem is the Riemann rearrangement theorem: if you start with a conditionally convergent series, it's possible to rearrange the terms to obtain any result you want: you can make it converge to any limit ##L##, or you can make it diverge to ##+\infty## or ##-\infty##. So if you rearrange the series as you are doing, you will have to carefully justify why doing so does not change the result.
 
Ah, I see my mistake now. I assumed the even powers would always be negative, and the odds always positive. I didn't think that they would be alternating. Yes, they would converge by the alternating series test.

Thanks,
Chris
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K