Test Nuclear Radiation detector

AI Thread Summary
To test the radiation detector, a source of ionizing radiation is necessary, as microwave or RF fields cannot mimic the required radiation types. Regulatory monitoring typically involves using a small check source, which may not require a license depending on the country. The detector in question outputs a square wave pulse for each detected particle, complicating the measurement of count rate and calibration. Users are advised to refer to check sources from manufacturers like Ludlum for proper testing. Proper calibration methods need to be established to ensure accurate readings from the detector.
mrmrzamany
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I want to test this radiation detector http://www.teviso.com/en/products/radiation-sensor-rd3024.htm

The problem is we don't have strong nuclear radiation sources or even weak ones , can i mimic the radiation ?? For example can i use Microwave sources or RF field or other radiation sources to test my sensor , if yes provide me with a method

Your Fast Replay is Appreciated
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You need a source of ionizing radiation. Typically for regulatory monitoring a small check source is provided to assure proper operation when used. Such sources should not require a license for possession of the source (perhaps this depend on the country) . see for example

http://www.ludlums.com/products/check-sources.

This detector does not seem to have a direct readout, only providing a square wave pulse output for each detected radiation particle. So how do you propose to actually measure the count rate and calibrate the instrument?
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top