Test Review 1 - lim sups and lim infs

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmurphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Review Test
cmurphy
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am taking Adv. Calc, and we have a test next week. I am going to post a few questions that I have from the review where I got stuck. If you have any help, please steer me in the right direction!

Question 1: Suppose sn <= 0 <= tn for n in N. Prove
(lim inf sn)(lim sup tn) <= lim inf (sntn), provided none of these products is of the form 0 * infinity.

Here is what I have so far:
Since sn <= 0, we must have lim inf sn <= 0.
Also, since tn >= 0, we must have lim sup tn >= 0.
Thus (lim inf sn)(lim sup tn) <= 0.

We also know that (sntn) <= 0.
This means that lim inf (sntn) <= 0.

I am having difficulties at this point, because the two things that I want to compare are both <= 0, so I don't have a way of comparing them.

I'm not sure where to go with this. Any suggestions?
Colleen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Would it be at all helpful to look at the fact that lim inf sn = -lim sup -sn, or is that just complicating matters?

Colleen
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top