Testing Change of Basis in Linear Operator

psholtz
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
I just want to test/verify my knowledge of change of basis in a linear operator.. (it's not a homework question).

Suppose I have linear operator mapping R^2 into R^2, and expressed in the canonical basis (1,0), (0,1). Suppose (for the sake of discussion) that the linear operator is given by:

A=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}5 & 6 \\ 7 & 8\end{array}\right)

Suppose now that I want to express this linear operator in a different basis, say (2,1), (1,2). To do this, I first apply the linear operator to the two (original) basis vectors:

A \cdot \left(\begin{array}{c}1 \\ 0 \end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}5 \\ 7\end{array}\right)

A \cdot \left(\begin{array}{c}0 \\ 1 \end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}6 \\ 8\end{array}\right)

To find the linear operator A' in the new basis, we express these two vectors in terms of the new basis vectors. Solving the equation for x1, x2 gives:

\left(\begin{array}{cc}2 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1 \\ x_2\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}5 \\ 7\end{array}\right)

x_1 = 1, x_2=3

and similarly:

\left(\begin{array}{cc}2 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 \end{array}\right) \left(\begin{array}{c}x_1 \\ x_2\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{c}6 \\ 8\end{array}\right)

x_1 = 4/3, x_2=10/3

So the expression for the linear operator in the new basis will be given by:

A' = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1 & 4/3 \\ 3 & 10/3\end{array}\right)

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let
<br /> B = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2 &amp; 1 \\ 1 &amp; 2 \end{array}\right) <br />

Now

<br /> A&#039; = B^{-1}AB = \frac{1}{3}\left(\begin{array}{cc}10 &amp; 11 \\ 28 &amp; 29 \end{array}\right)<br />
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top