Testing for chaos in data(method by Doyne Farmer for 3D discrete data)

marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
Testing for chaos in data

I have data for 3 variables ,each with respect to the discrete time values.
How do I check for the existence of chaos for this discrete 3D system?(I don't have the analytic eqs.,just the data.)

MY IDEAS ON CHECKING FOR CHAOS FROM DATA:(which of these are feasible on an algorithm?)

1.In Li and Yorke's paper, they describe "chaos" as the existence of orbits of all periods simultaneously(although they don't mention about the stability), I thought in this context that using a Fourier transform can show me visually the existence of periodic orbits and hence chaos.i.e a chaotic system would have a frequency(of oscillation) distributed over the entire range.

2.I have done a phase space reconstruction and the 3D plot doesn't look anything like a chaotic trajectory. It doesn't look like a attractor either. Can I check for chaos with the phase space reconstruction of these discrete data?

3.Since the data are discrete, does construction of a Poincaré map help in checking for chaos?Doyne Farmer used the same technique on a 1D system(see below).Can I use for 3D systems also?

P.S:
I just read in my textbook that when the physicist Doyne Farmer gathered ultrasonic sound data from drops of water hitting the floor and used the time difference between 2 sound peaks as the variable x(i.e he plotted a 2D graph between x_{t+1} and x_t), he observed a single hump in the x_{t+1} vs x_t graph,hence indicating the existence of a period∞ orbit a.k.a chaos.
 

Attachments

  • LPJ-RBF-Traj2.jpg
    LPJ-RBF-Traj2.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 445
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could perform some statistical tests to see if there is an underlying distribution or if all tests fail. If you have three trajectories, you could consider them one by one. It is in general difficult to find or reject a pattern on finitely many data, since they always can be explained by a polynomial. Therefore I guess that additional assumptions will have to be made.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top