Testing of Impact Sensor-Verify G-Force Readings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on testing a newly developed impact sensor to verify its G-force readings. Participants suggest methods such as free fall tests and pendulum setups, but a rotating test frame is proposed as a simpler alternative to create predictable G impacts. The formula for calculating centrifugal acceleration is mentioned, with a request for clarification on its accuracy regarding angular velocity and sensor weight. Recommendations include using rental equipment from Bruel and Kjaer and utilizing calibration labs for precise measurements. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurate testing methods for validating the sensor's performance.
WRB
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Testing of Impact Sensor--Verify G-Force Readings

I'm thinking either free fall test or pendulum
but I was just curious if anyone could suggest an easier method

We are looking for a way to test a newly developed impact sensor and verify that we when it says it has been hit with 5 g's for example that it actually was.
What would the most straightforward way to accuratly create a predictable known G impact?
With freefall our shop has no accurate way to measure impact time and Pendulum seems to be a test for fracture strength.

Any help or advice is appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it have to be an impact? If your device can register a constant acceleration, the easiest thing to do would be to put in a rotating test frame, at the end of an arm. Rotate the arm at an angular velocity that would produce a centrifugal acceleration equivalent to 5 gs.
 
Rotating it sounds like a good idea!
We are going to go that route...any tips on setting up a device or the calculations?

Thanks
 
I don't have my good physics book here, but I've been doing some research online and seems like the formula everyone uses is RCF=1.12r(rpm/1000)^2 (r is radius in mm)
this would tell me what radius and and what rpm to use...or is this wrong since it dosent take angular velocity or arm/sensor weight into account?

Thanks
 
Twas it mine, I'd get out a Bruel and Kjaer catalogue. The equipment is probably rentable.

Then, most cities have decent calibration labs, NIST traceable, that could do this.

Or, if this is completely homebrew, buy a high frequency accelerometer.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top