Testing relativity and_________

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
good find. I found that the link gave a shortened version of the full abstract that comes with the paper. Floyd Stecker is an authority on high energy astronomy and an insider (Goddard, Maryland).
I'll add this one to the links thread. It is encouraging that he talks confidently of GLAST launch in 2007
 
marcus said:
good find. I found that the link gave a shortened version of the full abstract that comes with the paper. Floyd Stecker is an authority on high energy astronomy and an insider (Goddard, Maryland).
I'll add this one to the links thread. It is encouraging that he talks confidently of GLAST launch in 2007

You know Marcus at last i am getting a sort of warm glow inside, i can not explain it but i am sure some thing tasty will come out of the oven soon.
 
wolram said:
You know Marcus at last i am getting a sort of warm glow inside, i can not explain it but i am sure some thing tasty will come out of the oven soon.

I hope you are right, Wolram.
 
When we know the quantum world what will be next? it is sort of the predictor of our future or lack of.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'

Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'

A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
View full post »

Thread 'Detecting Gravitons?'

I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
View full post »

Thread 'Gravitational self-interaction: another attempt to replace Dark Matter'

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Evidence of Strong Equivalence Principle Violations?
Replies
3
Views
2K
A MOND from SU(2) gravitational dipoles
Replies
1
Views
990
Is Doubly Special Relativity Connected to Variable Light Speed?
Replies
14
Views
4K
I Is this derivation of MOND from General Relativity plausible?
Replies
1
Views
3K
A What do you think of this definition of Spin Networks?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I How Does μ¨ Based Cosmology Impact Our Understanding of Galaxy Evolution?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Modified Newtonian Dynamics + dark matter sterile neutrinos or PBH?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Would NMSM or vMSM + 4D QG like LQG or AsG be TOE?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Observation of structures at ∼17 and ∼38 MeV/c2 in the γγ invariant mass spectra
Replies
10
Views
4K
I New scientist SU(5) Unification without Proton Decay
Replies
3
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top