Tetrahedron car crash prevention

djuiceholder
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine a planet in the shape of a regular tetrahedron (its surface consists of 4 equilateral triangles). Suppose that on each face there is a car traveling at a constant speed in clockwise direction along the edges bounding the face. Can they travel without crashing?


Homework Equations



I don't know how and where to start working on this problem

The Attempt at a Solution



I really need help :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
djuiceholder said:

Homework Statement



Imagine a planet in the shape of a regular tetrahedron (its surface consists of 4 equilateral triangles). Suppose that on each face there is a car traveling at a constant speed in clockwise direction along the edges bounding the face. Can they travel without crashing?

Homework Equations



I don't know how and where to start working on this problem

The Attempt at a Solution



I really need help :(

Have a look at this picture:
tetrahedroncars.jpg


Suppose, for example, the red car is on edge 3. Convince yourself that neither the yellow or green cars can be on the "opposite" edge 5 to prevent future collisions. The same idea works for each edge and its opposite. Does that give you any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Well, the OP seems to have disappeared, but I still think it is an interesting question. I think my last post leads to a proof that 4 cars can't do it. Even assuming there are traffic circles at the vertices, they will have a head-on collision along some edge.

But what about three cars? Without traffic circles at the vertices, so they can't arrive at a vertex at the same time, I don't think they can do it either, but I don't have a proof. If you assume they have traffic circles, then three cars can do it precisely by arriving at the vertices at the same time. Killing a bit of time with Maple, I made the following gif to illustrate it:

http://math.asu.edu/~kurtz/pix/cars.gif

You have to imagine the traffic circles. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow, thanks a lot. So, that means they can not travel without crashing. Even, 3 cars can't.
 
djuiceholder said:
wow, thanks a lot. So, that means they can not travel without crashing. Even, 3 cars can't.

I haven't proven that three cars can't do it without traffic circles, but I suspect they can't. The attached example shows an effort where they don't arrive at the intersections simultaneously. Unfortunately, there is an accident:

http://math.asu.edu/~kurtz/pix/cars2.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
50
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top