Classical Which resources should I use to prepare for the F=ma contest and USAPhO?

AI Thread Summary
For preparation for the F=MA contest and advancement to USAPhO, it's essential to choose the right textbooks. While Khan Academy offers a solid foundation, many find it insufficient for deeper understanding. HRK Physics may lack engaging problems, leading some to seek alternatives. David Morin's "Introduction to Classical Mechanics" is noted for its challenging problems and depth, particularly in special relativity, making it suitable for those with a strong background. In contrast, Taylor's "Classical Mechanics" is recommended as a more approachable introductory text, covering fundamental concepts clearly and effectively. It’s suggested to start with Taylor before progressing to Morin. For high school students, Morin's other book aimed at AP students provides a more accessible entry point while still being calculus-based. Additionally, Walter Lewin's physics lectures on YouTube are highly recommended for their engaging content.
member 659869
What textbook should I go through to be prepared for the F=MA contest and advance to USAPhO? Is Khan Academy AP Physics Enough? I have started HRK Physics but it seems to me to be quite boring, and out of ~50 practice problems at the end of each chapter I would say ~4-5 of them are interesting and actually difficult enough to be intellectually stimulating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, I will definitely do that but I also want to learn for fun from a textbook. Currently I am deciding between David Morins Introduction to Classical Mechanics and Taylor's Classical Mechanics? Which is better?
 
Morin's textbook (especially the problems) is much more difficult and is not for the novice, in my opinion. Of course, if you're able to work through it you will end up with a much better and deeper understanding of the subject. I especially liked the chapters devoted to special relativity in this regard - solving all the problems leaves you with a clear and thorough understanding of this beautiful theory (at this level of sophistication).

Taylor's is much friendlier as an introductory book and introduces all the basic stuff (Newton's laws, conservations laws, oscillations and normal modes, Kepler's problem, rigid bodies, non-inertial frames, collision theory, Lagrange's and Hamiltonian formulaiton, special relativity, even some chaos and continuum mechanics) in a very clear and lively manner. This is a very good book (as is Morin's) and Taylor is a great expositor. Though this book is not that advanced. I recommend starting with Taylor first, and the read Morin's one as a second textbook. Don't think you can just go for the latter, without having some skills and experience in classical mechanics.

Both books are pitched at the undergraduate level, so you better have studied some freshman physics course already.
 
For context, I am a freshman in high school, and I therefore i have little knowledge of physics relative to an entire year's course (basically nothing more than free-body diagrams). I think I will do Barron's E-Z Physics and Khan Academy, brush up on calculus then go into Morin from there
 
ShreyJ said:
For context, I am a freshman in high school

Morin has another physics book that is aimed at high school AP students, and is intended as a stepping stone to his university text. It’s still calculus-based but the problems are more accessible and includes discussions on problem solving strategies.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1482086921/?tag=pfamazon01-20

As a bonus, the book is quite inexpensive!

I also recommend Walter Lewin’s physics lectures on YouTube for their excellent content and sheer fun.

https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCliSRiiRVQuDfgxI_QN_Fmw/playlists
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top