High Energy Textbook for relativistic quantum mechanics and group theory

AI Thread Summary
Textbooks in relativistic quantum mechanics and group theory are essential for specialization in theoretical high-energy physics. While popular texts like Sakurai, Merzbacher, and Shankar are known, they may include outdated concepts that aren't beneficial for high-energy theorists. Instead, a focus on quantum field theory (QFT) is recommended, with M. D. Schwartz's "Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model" highlighted as a strong resource. For group theory, Bincer and Georgi are considered suitable, along with other recommended texts that emphasize symmetry principles and the Poincare group, such as those by Sexl and Urbandtke. Wachter's "Relativistic Quantum Mechanics" is noted for its clear exposition of the limitations of RQM compared to QFT, reinforcing the preference for QFT in modern theoretical physics.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Hi, I am looking for textbooks in relativistic quantum mechanics and group theory.

I have just finished my undergraduate studies in Physics and am looking to specialise in theoretical high-energy physics. Therefore, textbooks in relativistic quantum mechanics and group theory suited for that field of study would be most helpful.

On the top of my head, I can think of Sakurai, Merzbacher, Shankar, but don't they carry extra baggage that are not really useful for a practicing high-energy theorist?

Also, I am thinking of learning group theory from Bincer and Georgi. Thoughts?
 
  • Like
Likes dsatkas
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd not look at books titled relativistic quantum MECHANICS. Usually these cover outdated concepts using a wave-function approach that is not applicable in relativistic quantum theory. Better get a good book on quantum field theory, e.g.,

M. D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge Univ. Press
 
Another great book on group theory, focused on relativity and the Poincare group is

Sexl, Urbandtke, Relativity, Groups, Particles, Springer
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
vanhees71 said:
I'd not look at books titled relativistic quantum MECHANICS. Usually these cover outdated concepts using a wave-function approach that is not applicable in relativistic quantum theory.

I would just like to mention that there is one book that explicitly lays out relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM) (as opposed to quantum field theory (QFT)) in its proper context, and that is Wachter's Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. It shows precisely how far one can get with RQM and why we need QFT.
 
  • Like
Likes PWiz and dextercioby
Well, this is a great book in showing, why you don't want to do RQM but RQFT ;-)). SCNR.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top